Kawasaki Z900 2019 vs. Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z900 2019 vs Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

The Kawasaki Z900 2019 and the Suzuki GSX-S750 2017 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, inline four-cylinder engines. However, there are several differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Kawasaki Z900 2019 has a higher output with 125.4 HP compared to the Suzuki GSX-S750 2017's 114 HP. The Z900 also has a higher torque of 98.6 Nm compared to the GSX-S750's 81 Nm. This means that the Z900 may offer better acceleration and overall performance.

Both bikes have fuel injection systems and liquid cooling to ensure optimal engine performance. The Z900 has a larger displacement of 948ccm compared to the GSX-S750's 749ccm, which may contribute to its higher power output.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arms at the rear. The Z900's rear suspension offers preload and rebound adjustment, while the GSX-S750 only offers preload adjustment. The Z900 also has an aluminum shock absorber, which may provide better performance compared to the steel shock absorber on the GSX-S750.

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Kawasaki Z900 2019

The chassis of the Z900 is made of steel and has a double cradle frame, while the GSX-S750 has an aluminum frame with a twin tube design. Both frames are designed to provide stability and handling, but the choice between steel and aluminum may affect the overall weight and rigidity of the bike.

In terms of braking, both bikes have double disk brakes at the front, but the Z900 has larger diameter disks at 300mm compared to the GSX-S750's 310mm. The Z900 also has four-piston calipers at the front, while the GSX-S750 has double piston calipers. Both bikes are equipped with ABS for advanced rider assistance.

The dimensions and weights of the two bikes are similar, with both having a front tire width of 120mm and a rear tire width of 180mm. The wheelbase of the Z900 is slightly shorter at 1450mm compared to the GSX-S750's 1455mm. The seat height of the Z900 is also lower at 795mm compared to the GSX-S750's 820mm.

In terms of strengths, the Z900 offers light and natural handling with high stability, thanks to its chassis design. The engine of the Z900 is also praised for its smooth power delivery and strong mid-range pull. The sitting position of the Z900 is comfortable and offers a feel-good factor. Additionally, the Z900 is considered to have a fair price for its performance.

Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

On the other hand, the GSX-S750 is praised for its GSX-R 750 engine, which is known for its strong character. The brakes on the GSX-S750 are also commended for their power and control. The design of the GSX-S750 is described as harmonious, and the bike is considered to have an affordable price. The sharp sound and great lean angle clearance are also mentioned as strengths of the GSX-S750.

As for weaknesses, the Z900 has a TFT display mounted too low, which may make it difficult to read while riding. The menu operation on the Z900 is also described as cumbersome. The rearview mirrors on the Z900 offer modest visibility, which may be a disadvantage for some riders.

The GSX-S750 has an acute knee angle, which may affect rider comfort on longer rides. The tachometer on the GSX-S750 is also mentioned as difficult to read, which may be a minor inconvenience for some riders.

In conclusion, the Kawasaki Z900 2019 and the Suzuki GSX-S750 2017 are both capable naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Z900 offers a higher power output and more advanced suspension features, while the GSX-S750 has a strong engine character and powerful brakes. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z900 2019 compared to Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2019
Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore72 mm
StrokeStroke56 mmStroke46 mm
Engine powerEngine power125.4 HPEngine power114 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,500 rpm
TorqueTorque98.6 NmTorque81 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,700 rpmRpm at Torque9,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio12.3
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement948 ccmDisplacement749 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel120 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
TravelTravel140 mmTravel138 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentPreload
MaterialMaterialAluminiumMaterialSteel

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake65 degreeRake64.7 degree
TrailTrail105 mmTrail104 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter310 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter250 mmDiameter240 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,070 mmLength2,125 mm
WidthWidth820 mmWidth785 mm
HeightHeight1,065 mmHeight1,055 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,455 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height795 mmSeat Height820 mm
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Fortunately, the new Kawasaki Z900 has lost none of its character through the use of electronics. It is and remains a playful mid-range naked bike, which at the same time masters the brisk pace on the country road magnificently. The riding pleasure and suitability for everyday use are high, the now installed riding aids offer a plus in safety. Your opponents will have a really hard time from now on.

Light and natural handling with high stability

Silky engine with full pull from mid revs

High chassis transparency, great feedback

Sitting position with feel-good factor

Fair price

TFT display mounted too low

Cumbersome menu operation

Rear view mirrors offer modest visibility

Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

More power, more performance, more sound. Suzuki also proves all the pessimists regarding the EURO4 standard wrong and delivers the GSX-S 750, a successor to the GSR 750 that has been further developed in every respect and can be a bit more serious, but doesn't have to be. To ensure that aha moments don't become oje moments, ABS and a three-stage traction control that can be switched off provide a safety cushion. With S21 tyres from Bridgestone, the GSX-S is super-sporty, allowing you to take advantage of the generous lean angle clearance. Only the acute knee angle could be a disadvantage on longer tours.

GSX-R 750 engine with strong character

powerful, well-controlled brakes

harmonious design

affordable price

sharp sound

great lean angle clearance

acute knee angle

tachometer difficult to read

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z900 vs Suzuki GSX-S750

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z900 2019 and a Suzuki GSX-S750 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Kawasaki Z900 2019 is about 27% higher. Compared to Suzuki GSX-S750 2017 there are more Kawasaki Z900 2019 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 40 compared to 14. It takes less time to sell a Suzuki GSX-S750 with 84 days compared to 116 days for the Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 and 14 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S750 since model year 2017. The first review for the Kawasaki Z900 was published on 11/11/2016 and now has more than 93,200 views. This compares to more than 50,800 views for the first review on Suzuki GSX-S750 published on 04/10/2016.

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki GSX-S750

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH