KTM 200 EXC 2016 vs. Beta RR X-PRO 2T 200 2026

KTM 200 EXC 2016

KTM 200 EXC 2016

Beta RR X-PRO 2T 200 2026

Beta RR X-PRO 2T 200 2026

Loading...

Technical Specifications KTM 200 EXC 2016 compared to Beta RR X-PRO 2T 200 2026

KTM 200 EXC 2016
Beta RR X-PRO 2T 200 2026
KTM 200 EXC 2016
KTM 200 EXC 2016
Beta RR X-PRO 2T 200 2026
Beta RR X-PRO 2T 200 2026

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore64 mmBore62 mm
StrokeStroke60 mmStroke63 mm
StarterStarterElectric, KickStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionKokusanIgnitionCDI, Kokusan
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement193 ccmDisplacement190.2 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeCentral tubeFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width120 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,471 mmWheelbase1,477 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height960 mmSeat Height930 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight99.5 kgDry Weight97 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9.5 lFuel Tank Capacity9.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 200 EXC 2016

KTM 200 EXC 2016

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Beta RR X-PRO 2T 200 2026

Beta RR X-PRO 2T 200 2026

The Beta RR X-PRO 200 impresses with its light, agile handling and precise reponsiveness. Ideal for riders looking for a playful, controllable two-stroke experience that also scores points in technical passages. It offers flexibility and comfort, is robustly built and particularly comfortable on tight trails.

Light and agile handling

playful riding feel

predictable reponsiveness

easy control at low speeds

little effort required on technical passages

flexible and comfortable riding position

reliable cooling even at high temperatures

very revvvy engine

precise throttle response

good traction on sand and rocks

practical, customisable suspension

effective vibration damping

robust construction

versatile in use

new magnetic killswitch was not robust enough - problems with strong vibrations

graphic stickers show rapid signs of wear in practice

above-average 2-Stroke oil consumption

Alternative Comparisons

KTM 200 EXC 2016
VS.
KTM 150 EXC TPI 2022

KTM 200 EXC 2016 vs
KTM 150 EXC TPI 2022

KTM 200 EXC 2015
VS.
Husqvarna FC 250 2022

KTM 200 EXC 2015 vs
Husqvarna FC 250 2022

KTM 200 EXC 2016
VS.
KTM 300 EXC 2023

KTM 200 EXC 2016 vs
KTM 300 EXC 2023

KTM 200 EXC 2016
VS.
Beta RR 200 2T 2020

KTM 200 EXC 2016 vs
Beta RR 200 2T 2020

Beta RR 200 2T 2024
VS.
Beta RR X-PRO 2T 200 2025

Beta RR 200 2T 2024 vs
Beta RR X-PRO 2T 200 2025

KTM 200 EXC 2013
VS.
KTM 250 EXC-F 2008

KTM 200 EXC 2013 vs
KTM 250 EXC-F 2008

KTM 200 EXC 2005
VS.
KTM 300 EXC 2007

KTM 200 EXC 2005 vs
KTM 300 EXC 2007

KTM 200 EXC 2016
VS.
KTM 125 EXC 2016

KTM 200 EXC 2016 vs
KTM 125 EXC 2016

Beta RR X-PRO 2T 200 2025
VS.
Beta RR Racing 2T 200 2024

Beta RR X-PRO 2T 200 2025 vs
Beta RR Racing 2T 200 2024

KTM 250 EXC 2014
VS.
KTM 200 EXC 2014

KTM 250 EXC 2014 vs
KTM 200 EXC 2014

KTM 200 EXC 2016
VS.
KTM 250 EXC 2016

KTM 200 EXC 2016 vs
KTM 250 EXC 2016

KTM 200 EXC 2016
VS.
KTM 125 Duke 2020

KTM 200 EXC 2016 vs
KTM 125 Duke 2020

KTM 200 EXC 2016
VS.
KTM 690 SMC R 2020

KTM 200 EXC 2016 vs
KTM 690 SMC R 2020