Kawasaki Z900 2025 vs. CFMOTO 675NK 2026

Kawasaki Z900 2025

Kawasaki Z900 2025

CFMOTO 675NK 2026

CFMOTO 675NK 2026

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z900 2025 vs CFMOTO 675NK 2026

Kawasaki Z900 2025

Kawasaki Z900 2025

CFMOTO 675NK 2026

CFMOTO 675NK 2026

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z900 2025 compared to CFMOTO 675NK 2026

Kawasaki Z900 2025
CFMOTO 675NK 2026

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore72 mm
StrokeStroke56 mmStroke55.2 mm
Engine powerEngine power124 HPEngine power90 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque97.4 NmTorque68 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,700 rpmRpm at Torque8,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio11.5
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping, Clutch systems
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement948 ccmDisplacement674 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel130 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel140 mmTravel130 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound
MaterialMaterialAluminiumMaterialAluminium

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter300 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
ActuationActuationHydraulicActuationHydraulic
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter250 mmDiameter240 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Shift assistant with blipper, Cruise control, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,065 mmLength2,020 mm
WidthWidth830 mmWidth849 mm
HeightHeight1,075 mmHeight1,155 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,400 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height830 mmSeat Height810 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)213 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)189 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity15 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA2, A
RangeRange354 kmRange272 km
Combined CO2 emissionsCombined CO2 emissions117 g/kmCombined CO2 emissions130 g/km
Combined fuel consumptionCombined fuel consumption4.8 l/100kmCombined fuel consumption5.5 l/100km
Euro NormEuro NormEuro 5+Euro NormEuro 5+

Equipment

EquipmentEquipmentLED daytime running lights, LED-Headlights, TFT displayEquipmentLED daytime running lights, LED-Headlights, TFT display, Modern electronics, Lighting

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z900 2025

Kawasaki Z900 2025

The new Z900 masters the balancing act between modernisation and proven virtues remarkably well. The 6-axle IMU, the precise quickshifter and the new electronics package make it technically absolutely up-to-date, while the characterful four-cylinder engine loses none of its fascination despite Euro 5+. The harmonious setup of all components is particularly impressive: whether suspension, engine or ergonomics - the overall package is just right.

Harmonious engine with impressive acceleration in the mid-range

very well functioning quickshifter with precise responsiveness

mature riding performance with a good compromise between stability and nimble handling

sensitive 6-axle IMU with harmonious control

superbly tuned seating position

excellent engine reponsiveness

confident cornering behaviour with transparent feedback from the front

harmonious electronics that do not restrict riding pleasure

smooth transmission with perfectly tuned ratios

first-class stop-and-go behaviour in city traffic

intuitive bike for beginners and experienced riders

slim waist despite four-cylinder layout

Great 5 inch display but the possibilities are not perfectly utilised with the Rideology app

licence plate holder seems a little carelessly integrated into the design

fuel consumption in practice significantly higher than factory specification (6.0-6.5l instead of 4.8l)

suspension of the basic version a little stiff on poor asphalt

promised app functions not yet available at the time of testing

CFMOTO 675NK 2026

CFMOTO 675NK 2026

The CFMOTO 675NK is a successful naked bike for solo riders who are looking for something independent. It offers plenty of features, good riding performance and a cool look - with minor weaknesses in engine tuning and comfort. But you can forgive it a lot when you first read the price tag and then hear the purring of the three-cylinder engine.

Three-cylinder engine with a throaty sound

Modern design & high-quality workmanship

Easy-to-read 5-inch TFT display

Upright seating position

Two-stage, disengageable traction control & ABS

Load change reactions below 4,000 rpm

no ride-by-wire

quickshifter only for upshifting

Price Comparison Average Market Price Kawasaki Z900 vs CFMOTO 675NK

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price CFMOTO 675NK

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons