Triumph Tiger 1050 2008 vs. BMW F 700 GS 2013

Triumph Tiger 1050 2008

Triumph Tiger 1050 2008

BMW F 700 GS 2013

BMW F 700 GS 2013

Loading...

Technical Specifications Triumph Tiger 1050 2008 compared to BMW F 700 GS 2013

Triumph Tiger 1050 2008
BMW F 700 GS 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power115 HPEngine power75 HP
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement1,050 ccmDisplacement798 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,510 mmWheelbase1,562 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height835 mmSeat Height820 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity20 lFuel Tank Capacity16 l
Top SpeedTop Speed215 km/hTop Speed192 km/h
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Tiger 1050 2008

Triumph Tiger 1050 2008

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

BMW F 700 GS 2013

BMW F 700 GS 2013

The smaller of the two F GS sisters, the F 700 GS convinces with a successful overall performance. It looks like its big sister, but at its core it is more of a lively naked bike than a big enduro. The fact that the bike has outgrown the entry-level segment can be seen in the braking system - with two brake discs at the front, it is on a par with its big 800 sister and now decelerates just as confidently. In terms of the chassis, it convinces with good suspension comfort and at the same time a firm set-up in tight bends. Upgrading is never a problem with BMW; in addition to traction control, there is also the electronic suspension ESA for the F 700 GS.

Very manageable

surprisingly powerful

comfortable seating position

low seat height

good brakes

good price.

any optics

Price Comparison Average Market Price Triumph Tiger 1050 vs BMW F 700 GS

Price Triumph Tiger 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW F 700 GS

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons