Husqvarna TE 510 2010 vs. SWM RS 500 R 2016

Husqvarna TE 510 2010

Husqvarna TE 510 2010

SWM RS 500 R 2016

SWM RS 500 R 2016

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna TE 510 2010 vs SWM RS 500 R 2016

Husqvarna TE 510 2010

Husqvarna TE 510 2010

SWM RS 500 R 2016

SWM RS 500 R 2016

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 510 2010 compared to SWM RS 500 R 2016

Husqvarna TE 510 2010
SWM RS 500 R 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore97 mmBore97 mm
StrokeStroke67.8 mmStroke67.8 mm
StarterStarterKickStarterElectric
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement501 ccmDisplacement501 ccm

Suspension Front

BrandBrandKayabaBrandKayaba

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandKayabaBrandKayaba

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,483 mmWheelbase1,495 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height963 mmSeat Height963 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight113 kgDry Weight112 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.2 lFuel Tank Capacity7.2 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna TE 510 vs SWM RS 500 R

Price Husqvarna TE 510

Model year
Current average market prices

Price SWM RS 500 R

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH