BMW C 400 GT 2025 vs. Suzuki Burgman 400 2016

BMW C 400 GT 2025

BMW C 400 GT 2025

Suzuki Burgman 400 2016

Suzuki Burgman 400 2016

Loading...

Technical Specifications BMW C 400 GT 2025 compared to Suzuki Burgman 400 2016

BMW C 400 GT 2025
Suzuki Burgman 400 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore80 mmBore81 mm
StrokeStroke69.6 mmStroke77.6 mm
Engine powerEngine power34 HPEngine power34 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,300 rpm
TorqueTorque35 NmTorque36.3 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque5,750 rpmRpm at Torque5,800 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio11.2
TransmissionTransmissionBeltTransmissionBelt
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeVariomaticTransmission TypeVariomatic
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesOHCValvesDOHC
DisplacementDisplacement350 ccmDisplacement400 ccm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height80 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter15 inchFront tyre diameter14 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter14 inchRear tyre diameter13 inch
LengthLength2,200 mmLength2,270 mm
WidthWidth845 mmWidth760 mm
HeightHeight1,500 mmHeight1,385 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,565 mmWheelbase1,585 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height765 mmSeat Height710 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)219 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)222 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity12.8 lFuel Tank Capacity13.5 l
Top SpeedTop Speed129 km/hTop Speed145 km/h
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW C 400 GT 2025

BMW C 400 GT 2025

The BMW C 400 GT is clearly the right choice for anyone who wants as much comfort, storage space and confidence as possible in everyday scooter use. It has a cultivated ride, offers good wind protection, scores points with its revised storage space concept and feels mature and high-quality even at higher speeds or with a pillion. It is precisely this calm, elegant appearance that makes it a genuine premium maxi scooter. Due to its size, it is not quite as nimble in the city as the X, but it shows its strengths all the more on commuting routes, overland passages and in daily comfort use.

High riding comfort

Good wind and weather protection

Noticeably more storage space than the C 400 X

Practical Flexcase system

High-quality, confident riding impressions

Also convincing for two

Adjustable windscreen

Cultivated engine running even at motorway speeds

Larger and heavier in city traffic

Less nimble when manoeuvring and lane splitting Flexcase can only be used when stationary

Suzuki Burgman 400 2016

Suzuki Burgman 400 2016

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Average Market Price BMW C 400 GT vs Suzuki Burgman 400

Price BMW C 400 GT

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki Burgman 400

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons