KTM 990 Duke 2025 vs. Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2026

KTM 990 Duke 2025

KTM 990 Duke 2025

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2026

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2026

Loading...

Technical Specifications KTM 990 Duke 2025 compared to Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2026

KTM 990 Duke 2025
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2026

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore92.5 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke70.4 mmStroke53.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power123 HPEngine power130 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power12,000 rpm
TorqueTorque103 NmTorque80 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,750 rpmRpm at Torque9,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13.5 Compression Ratio13.25
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeAntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping, Clutch systems
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement947 ccmDisplacement765 ccm

Suspension Front

BrandBrandWPBrandShowa
TravelTravel140 mmTravel115 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
BrandBrandWPBrandÖhlins
TravelTravel150 mmTravel131 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameChromium-molybdenumFrameAluminium
RakeRake65.8 degreeRake23.2 degree
TrailTrail100 mmTrail96.9 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter310 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter240 mmDiameter220 mm
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Quickshifter, Shift assistant with blipper, Traction control, Anti-wheelie, Modern electronics

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,476 mmWheelbase1,399 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height825 mmSeat Height836 mm
Dry Weight (with ABS)Dry Weight (with ABS)179 kgDry Weight (with ABS)166 kg
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)190 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)188 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14.5 lFuel Tank Capacity15 l
RangeRange314 kmRange277 km
Combined CO2 emissionsCombined CO2 emissions110 g/kmCombined CO2 emissions120 g/km
Combined fuel consumptionCombined fuel consumption4.7 l/100kmCombined fuel consumption5.4 l/100km

Equipment

EquipmentEquipmentLED-HeadlightsEquipmentLED daytime running lights, LED-Headlights, TFT display, Modern electronics, Lighting

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 990 Duke 2025

KTM 990 Duke 2025

In a direct comparison, the KTM 990 Duke is the more sensible choice, without feeling sensible or even boring. Its 123 Horsepower twin-cylinder engine delivers the same powerful grunt from low revs as the R, runs smoothly and is hardly any less fun on country roads. The softer WP suspension also offers sufficient support for a very sporty pace, whilst remaining slightly more accessible in everyday use and on longer journeys. For most riders, the standard Duke is perfectly adequate. It’s only during very hard braking manoeuvres, at high cornering speeds or with regular track use that it reaches its limits sooner than the R. Those who can do without the more modern touchscreen get a powerful, versatile naked bike with surprisingly good long-distance capabilities.

A powerful and smooth-running twin-cylinder engine

excellent handling on country roads

more comfortable suspension

pleasant, upright ergonomics

also suitable for longer tours

cheaper than the R

less suspension travel when driven hard

the brakes require more hand force at maximum delay

a simpler display

lower peak power

only a second choice for frequent use on the racetrack

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2026

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2026

**Conclusion** The Triumph Street Triple RS impresses as a sporty naked bike with precise and stable riding performance, excellent brakes and a powerful three-cylinder engine. The comprehensive electronic equipment and high build quality round off the positive overall picture. Despite the tight setup and the necessary warm-up time for the tyres, the Street Triple RS offers an outstanding riding experience for riders with sporting ambitions. Minor weaknesses such as the cumbersome operation of the joystick and the moderate spray protection are more than compensated for by the bike's versatility and customisation options. Overall, the Street Triple RS is an excellent choice for those who value sporty precision and riding pleasure.

Engine power and revviness

precise and stable riding performance

excellent brakes

comprehensive electronic equipment

high build quality

good price-performance ratio

sporty suspension

classic-sporty seating position

versatile customisation options

strong character and sound of the engine.

Tyres need time to warm up

nervous turning at low temperatures

sharp brakes difficult to control for less experienced riders

awkward joystick operation

overloaded instrument displays - revs difficult to read

poor spray protection.

Price Comparison Average Market Price KTM 990 Duke vs Triumph Street Triple 765 RS

Price KTM 990 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Street Triple 765 RS

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons