Husqvarna Vitpilen 801 L 2025 vs. Kawasaki ER-6n 2015

Husqvarna Vitpilen 801 L 2025

Husqvarna Vitpilen 801 L 2025

Kawasaki ER-6n 2015

Kawasaki ER-6n 2015

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husqvarna Vitpilen 801 L 2025 compared to Kawasaki ER-6n 2015

Husqvarna Vitpilen 801 L 2025
Kawasaki ER-6n 2015
Husqvarna Vitpilen 801 L 2025
Husqvarna Vitpilen 801 L 2025
Kawasaki ER-6n 2015
Kawasaki ER-6n 2015

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore88 mmBore83 mm
StrokeStroke65.7 mmStroke60 mm
Engine powerEngine power95 HPEngine power72 HP
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.5 Compression Ratio10.8
Clutch TypeClutch TypeCentrifugal forceClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement799 ccmDisplacement649 ccm

Suspension Rear

Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameChromium-molybdenumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeLoad-bearing engineFrame typePerimeter

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonDouble piston
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyPetal

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width160 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,475 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height820 mmSeat Height805 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16 lFuel Tank Capacity16 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2, ALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna Vitpilen 801 L 2025

Husqvarna Vitpilen 801 L 2025

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Kawasaki ER-6n 2015

Kawasaki ER-6n 2015

The engine is hearty and a lot of fun, plus the ER shines with a Japanese meticulous finish and a fighting price.

Solid handling

high quality level

weak brake

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna Vitpilen 801 L vs Kawasaki ER-6n

Price Husqvarna Vitpilen 801 L

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki ER-6n

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

Kawasaki ER-6f 2016
VS.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Kawasaki ER-6f 2016 vs
Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Kawasaki ER-5 2005
VS.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2007

Kawasaki ER-5 2005 vs
Kawasaki ER-6n 2007

Kawasaki Z 650 2021
VS.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2015

Kawasaki Z 650 2021 vs
Kawasaki ER-6n 2015

Husqvarna Vitpilen 801 L 2025
VS.
Husqvarna Vitpilen 801 2025

Husqvarna Vitpilen 801 L 2025 vs
Husqvarna Vitpilen 801 2025

Kawasaki ER-6n 2010
VS.
Kawasaki Z 650 2020

Kawasaki ER-6n 2010 vs
Kawasaki Z 650 2020

Kawasaki Versys 650 2009
VS.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2010

Kawasaki Versys 650 2009 vs
Kawasaki ER-6n 2010

Yamaha XJ6 2012
VS.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2012

Yamaha XJ6 2012 vs
Kawasaki ER-6n 2012

Yamaha MT-07 2021
VS.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Yamaha MT-07 2021 vs
Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016
VS.
Kawasaki Ninja 650 2018

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016 vs
Kawasaki Ninja 650 2018

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016
VS.
Kawasaki Z900 2021

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016 vs
Kawasaki Z900 2021

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016
VS.
Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2013

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016 vs
Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2013

Kawasaki ER-6n 2011
VS.
BMW F 800 R 2010

Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 vs
BMW F 800 R 2010

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016
VS.
Kawasaki Ninja 650 2021

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016 vs
Kawasaki Ninja 650 2021