Beta Evo 125 2T My10 2010 vs. Husaberg TE 125 2012

Beta Evo 125 2T My10 2010

Beta Evo 125 2T My10 2010

Husaberg TE 125 2012

Husaberg TE 125 2012

Loading...

Technical Specifications Beta Evo 125 2T My10 2010 compared to Husaberg TE 125 2012

Beta Evo 125 2T My10 2010
Husaberg TE 125 2012

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore54 mmBore54 mm
StrokeStroke54 mmStroke54.5 mm
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement124 ccmDisplacement124.8 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeCentral tube

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Rear tyre widthRear tyre width40 mmRear tyre width120 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height18 %Rear tyre height90 %
WheelbaseWheelbase1,305 mmWheelbase1,475 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height660 mmSeat Height990 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight68 kgDry Weight97 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity2.6 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Beta Evo 125 2T My10 2010

Beta Evo 125 2T My10 2010

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husaberg TE 125 2012

Husaberg TE 125 2012

The little one with the somewhat nervous temperament joined the Swedish family only last year. The 125 is certainly not the easiest Husaberg to ride, but if you can master the TE 125, you can master all the others.

Feather-light dry weight

nimble on the move.

Chassis needs getting used to

steep ascents complicated.

Alternative Comparisons