Honda FMX650 2005 vs. Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Honda FMX650 2005

Honda FMX650 2005

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Loading...

Technical Specifications Honda FMX650 2005 compared to Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Honda FMX650 2005
Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power38 HPEngine power72 HP
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingAirCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement644 ccmDisplacement649 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,490 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height875 mmSeat Height805 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity11 lFuel Tank Capacity16 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Honda FMX650 2005

Honda FMX650 2005

The bike is nimble in the city, uncomplicated to handle and very frugal in terms of service costs.

Uncomplicated driving pleasure

looks

nice torque curve

beginner-friendly

high-quality chassis

good brake system

easy handling.

Not too high performance

inadvisable for somewhat longer tours.

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

The engine is hearty and a lot of fun, plus the ER shines with a Japanese meticulous finish and a fighting price.

Solid handling

high quality level

weak brake

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Honda FMX650 vs Kawasaki ER-6n

Price Honda FMX650

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki ER-6n

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons