SWM SM 125 R 2017 vs. Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

SWM SM 125 R 2017

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013
Loading...
Overview - SWM SM 125 R 2017 vs Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

SWM SM 125 R 2017

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013
Technical Specifications SWM SM 125 R 2017 compared to Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013
SWM SM 125 R 2017
Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013
Engine and Drive Train
Bore | Bore | 58 mm | Bore | 54 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stroke | Stroke | 47.2 mm | Stroke | 54.5 mm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 12.8 | Compression Ratio | 8.8 |
Starter | Starter | Electric | Starter | Kick |
Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 1 | Cylinders | 1 |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 2-Stroke |
Displacement | Displacement | 124.7 ccm | Displacement | 124 ccm |
Suspension Front
Front suspension | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork |
---|
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 110 mm | Front tyre width | 110 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 140 mm | Rear tyre width | 150 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 70 % | Rear tyre height | 60 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,485 mm | Wheelbase | 1,470 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 913 mm | Seat Height | 870 mm |
Dry Weight | Dry Weight | 117 kg | Dry Weight | 113.5 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 7.2 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 9.5 l |
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
SWM SM 125 R 2017

Inexpensive 125cc with a very smart and sporty design.
Price
Optics
Brake
Chassis
Cold running behaviour: Tyres
Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.