Magazine
Brands
Top Awards
Compare
About us
Home
Husqvarna SM 510R 2009 vs. Beta RR Enduro 50 Standard 2014
Husqvarna SM 510R 2009
Beta RR Enduro 50 Standard 2014
Loading...
Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 510R 2009 compared to Beta RR Enduro 50 Standard 2014
Husqvarna SM 510R 2009
Beta RR Enduro 50 Standard 2014
Show all
Same only
Differences
Husqvarna SM 510R 2009
Beta RR Enduro 50 Standard 2014
Engine and Drive Train
Bore
Bore
97 mm
Bore
40.3 mm
Stroke
Stroke
67.8 mm
Stroke
39 mm
Cooling
Cooling
liquid
Cooling
liquid
Displacement
Displacement
501 ccm
Displacement
49.7 ccm
Brakes Rear
Type
Type
Disc
Type
Disc
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre diameter
Front tyre diameter
17 inch
Front tyre diameter
21 inch
Rear tyre diameter
Rear tyre diameter
17 inch
Rear tyre diameter
18 inch
Wheelbase
Wheelbase
1,445 mm
Wheelbase
1,385 mm
Seat Height
Seat Height
920 mm
Seat Height
930 mm
Dry Weight
Dry Weight
118 kg
Dry Weight
85 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity
Fuel Tank Capacity
7.2 l
Fuel Tank Capacity
6.5 l
Alternative Comparisons
VS.
Husqvarna SM 510R 2005 vs
Husqvarna FE 501 2021
VS.
Husqvarna SM 510R 2010 vs
Husqvarna SMR 510 2006
VS.
Husqvarna SM 511 R 2012 vs
Husqvarna SM 510R 2011
VS.
Husqvarna SMR 510 2006 vs
Husqvarna SM 510R 2005
VS.
Husqvarna SM 510R 2011 vs
Husqvarna SMR 510 2006
VS.
Husqvarna SM 450 R 2011 vs
Husqvarna SM 510R 2011
VS.
Beta RR 50 Enduro Sport 2021 vs
Beta RR Enduro 50 Standard 2012
VS.
Husqvarna SM 510R 2005 vs
SWM SM 500 R 2020
VS.
Husqvarna TE 510 2009 vs
Husqvarna SM 510R 2009
VS.
Husqvarna SM 510R 2005 vs
Husaberg FE 550 E 2005
VS.
Beta RR 50 Motard Sport 2024 vs
Beta RR Enduro 50 Standard 2012
VS.
Aprilia SX 125 Supermoto 2018 vs
Husqvarna SM 510R 2011
VS.
Husqvarna SM 510R 2010 vs
SWM SM 500 R 2020