BMW S 1000 RR 2011 vs. Polaris Sportsman 500 HO 2009

BMW S 1000 RR 2011

BMW S 1000 RR 2011

Polaris Sportsman 500 HO 2009

Polaris Sportsman 500 HO 2009

Loading...

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 RR 2011 compared to Polaris Sportsman 500 HO 2009

BMW S 1000 RR 2011
Polaris Sportsman 500 HO 2009

Engine and Drive Train

StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement498 ccm

Brakes Front

ActuationActuationHydraulicActuationHydraulic

Dimensions and Weights

Seat HeightSeat Height820 mmSeat Height857 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight183 kgDry Weight316 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity15.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 RR 2011

BMW S 1000 RR 2011

The most important changes to the S 1000 RR, however, were the numerous small adjustments to the chassis and geometry. Here we now benefit from thousands of test kilometres from the BMW test crew. This is logical evolution and a great step forward.

Improved driveability - optimised torque curve

plenty of power

strong engine

good traction point

immaculately functioning shift assist.

Accelerating load is very fatiguing.

Polaris Sportsman 500 HO 2009

Polaris Sportsman 500 HO 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 RR vs Polaris Sportsman 500 HO

Price BMW S 1000 RR

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Polaris Sportsman 500 HO

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons