BMW F 800 GS 2015 vs. Suzuki V-Strom 650 XT 2020

BMW F 800 GS 2015

Suzuki V-Strom 650 XT 2020
Loading...
Technical Specifications BMW F 800 GS 2015 compared to Suzuki V-Strom 650 XT 2020
BMW F 800 GS 2015
Suzuki V-Strom 650 XT 2020
Engine and Drive Train
Bore | Bore | 82 mm | Bore | 81 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stroke | Stroke | 75.6 mm | Stroke | 62.6 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 86 HP | Engine power | 71 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 7,500 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 8,800 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 83 Nm | Torque | 62 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 5,750 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 6,500 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 12 | Compression Ratio | 11.2 |
Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath |
Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
Number of gears | Number of gears | 6 | Number of gears | 6 |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 2 | Cylinders | 2 |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
Can be restricted for A2 licence | Can be restricted for A2 licence | Yes | Can be restricted for A2 licence | Yes |
Displacement | Displacement | 798 ccm | Displacement | 645 ccm |
Suspension Front
Front suspension | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork | Front suspension | Telescopic fork |
---|
Suspension Rear
Suspension | Suspension | Swing arm | Suspension | Swing arm |
---|
Chassis
Frame | Frame | Steel | Frame | Aluminium |
---|---|---|---|---|
Frame type | Frame type | Tubular, Load-bearing engine | Frame type | Twin Tube |
Brakes Front
Type | Type | Double disk | Type | Double disk |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Double piston | Piston | Double piston |
Shock mount | Shock mount | Floating caliper | Shock mount | Floating caliper |
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Single piston | Piston | Single piston |
Assistance Systems
Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | Suspension electronically adjustable | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | ABS, Traction control |
---|
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 90 mm | Front tyre width | 110 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 90 % | Front tyre height | 80 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 21 inch | Front tyre diameter | 19 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 150 mm | Rear tyre width | 150 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 70 % | Rear tyre height | 70 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Length | Length | 2,320 mm | Length | 2,275 mm |
Width | Width | 890 mm | Width | 835 mm |
Height | Height | 1,350 mm | Height | 1,405 mm |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,578 mm | Wheelbase | 1,560 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 880 mm | Seat Height | 815 mm |
Kerb Weight (with ABS) | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 214 kg | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 216 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 16 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 20 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A | License compliancy | A |
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
BMW F 800 GS 2015

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.
Suzuki V-Strom 650 XT 2020

The V-Strom 650 XT may be getting on a bit, but it's still a good bike. Especially if you don't need a colour display and don't intend to leave the paved road. The 650 is an easy motorbike to ride and is hardly ever out of its depth. What's more, this model has already proven itself a zillion times over, which underlines its durability and longevity.
Simple, uncomplicated bike
proven technology
good price/performance ratio
Design and equipment are a bit outdated
very limited off-road capability
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW F 800 GS vs Suzuki V-Strom 650 XT
Price BMW F 800 GS
Model year
Current average market prices
Price Suzuki V-Strom 650 XT
Model year
Current average market prices