Husqvarna SM 510R 2011 vs. Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 510R 2011 compared to Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Husqvarna SM 510R 2011

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Show all

Same only

Differences

Husqvarna SM 510R 2011

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	97 mm	Bore	72 mm
Stroke	Stroke	67.8 mm	Stroke	72 mm
Compression Ratio	Compression Ratio	12.9	Compression Ratio	6.9
Starter	Starter	Electric	Starter	Kick
Transmission	Transmission	Chain	Transmission	Chain
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	4-Stroke	Strokes	2-Stroke
Displacement	Displacement	501 ccm	Displacement	293 ccm

Suspension Front

Brand	Brand	Marzocchi	Brand	Kayaba

Suspension Rear

Brand	Brand	Marzocchi	Brand	Kayaba

Brakes Front

Technology	Technology	Wave	Technology	Wave

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	120 mm	Front tyre width	90 mm
Front tyre height	Front tyre height	70 %	Front tyre height	90 %
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	17 inch	Front tyre diameter	21 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	150 mm	Rear tyre width	140 mm
Rear tyre height	Rear tyre height	60 %	Rear tyre height	80 %
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	17 inch	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,445 mm	Wheelbase	1,465 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	920 mm	Seat Height	975 mm
Dry Weight	Dry Weight	120.5 kg	Dry Weight	103 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	7.2 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	9.5 l