Beta RR 300 2T 2022 vs. Husqvarna TE 310 2011

Beta RR 300 2T 2022

Beta RR 300 2T 2022

Husqvarna TE 310 2011

Husqvarna TE 310 2011

Loading...

Technical Specifications Beta RR 300 2T 2022 compared to Husqvarna TE 310 2011

Beta RR 300 2T 2022
Husqvarna TE 310 2011

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore73 mmBore83 mm
StrokeStroke69.9 mmStroke55 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.6 Compression Ratio12.9
StarterStarterElectricStarterKick
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement292.3 ccmDisplacement297 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Brakes Front

TechnologyTechnologyWaveTechnologyWave

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width120 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height90 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,482 mmWheelbase1,495 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height930 mmSeat Height963 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight103.5 kgDry Weight111 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9.5 lFuel Tank Capacity7.2 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Beta RR 300 2T vs Husqvarna TE 310

Price Beta RR 300 2T

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna TE 310

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons