Benelli TRK 702 2025 vs. CFMOTO 800MT 2022

Benelli TRK 702 2025

Benelli TRK 702 2025

CFMOTO 800MT 2022

CFMOTO 800MT 2022

Loading...

Overview - Benelli TRK 702 2025 vs CFMOTO 800MT 2022

Benelli TRK 702 2025

Benelli TRK 702 2025

CFMOTO 800MT 2022

CFMOTO 800MT 2022

Technical Specifications Benelli TRK 702 2025 compared to CFMOTO 800MT 2022

Benelli TRK 702 2025
CFMOTO 800MT 2022

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
Engine powerEngine power76.2 HPEngine power91 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,750 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,250 rpm
TorqueTorque68.2 NmTorque77 Nm
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement698 ccmDisplacement799 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandMarzocchiBrandKayaba
DiameterDiameter50 mmDiameter43 mm
TravelTravel140 mmTravel160 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel168 mmTravel150 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound
MaterialMaterialAluminiumMaterialAluminium

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter320 mmDiameter320 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter19 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,198 mmLength2,234 mm
WidthWidth925 mmWidth853 mm
HeightHeight1,440 mmHeight1,475 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height790 mmSeat Height825 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)235 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)231 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity20 lFuel Tank Capacity19 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA

Equipment

EquipmentEquipmentLED daytime running lights, LED-Headlights, TFT displayEquipmentLED daytime running lights, Windscreen adjustable

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Benelli TRK 702 2025

Benelli TRK 702 2025

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

CFMOTO 800MT 2022

CFMOTO 800MT 2022

If you look at the equipment list of the 800MT, especially the Touring version, you will be amazed at how much can be fitted as standard in a comparatively inexpensive mid-range touring enduro. The pannier system even scores with a smart lining for the panniers and top case. The chassis and brakes are good, the engine could be a little livelier and jerk less when cold, but overall the performance is good. However, the 800MT is by no means flawless. The technicians definitely need to improve the shift assistant and the menu navigation could be simpler. Visually, however, there is not much to complain about; the cooperation with Kiska-Design pays off!

Comfortable seating position

good brakes

good handling

comfortable chassis

extensive equipment

attractive design.

Shift assistant too sluggish for sporty driving

no traction control

engine jerks when cold

complicated menu navigation

cruise control only up to 130 km/h

Price Comparison Average Market Price Benelli TRK 702 vs CFMOTO 800MT

Price Benelli TRK 702

Model year
Current average market prices

Price CFMOTO 800MT

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons