Beta Alp 4.0 2009 vs. Beta Xtrainer 300 2020

Beta Alp 4.0 2009

Beta Alp 4.0 2009

Beta Xtrainer 300 2020

Beta Xtrainer 300 2020

Loading...

Technical Specifications Beta Alp 4.0 2009 compared to Beta Xtrainer 300 2020

Beta Alp 4.0 2009
Beta Xtrainer 300 2020

Engine and Drive Train

StrokeStroke83 mmStroke72 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio9.5 Compression Ratio11.45
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
CoolingCoolingAirCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement349 ccmDisplacement293.1 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
LengthLength2,208 mmLength2,157 mm
WidthWidth850 mmWidth802 mm
HeightHeight356 mmHeight1,245 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,444 mmWheelbase1,467 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height863 mmSeat Height910 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight133 kgDry Weight99 kg

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Beta Alp 4.0 2009

Beta Alp 4.0 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Beta Xtrainer 300 2020

Beta Xtrainer 300 2020

All in all: a lot of Enduro for little money - the 1000PS editorial team is thrilled. The seat height on the Xtrainer is about 2 centimetres lower than on competition-oriented sister models, which creates a lot of security in the saddle and also makes it particularly interesting for smaller riders. With the slightly slimmer frame and about 1.5 centimetres less wheelbase, the Xtrainer is easy to manoeuvre through the undergrowth. Especially in slow and technical passages, it scores points with this manoeuvrability and at the same time gives a sovereign feeling in the saddle. The engine is wonderfully linear in every situation and always perfectly controllable. You never have the feeling of being underpowered with its 36 hp in the open version. With the slimmed-down chassis, there are actually only disadvantages in fast sections or on the occasional excursion to the motocross track. Here it is no longer in its territory and the usual hard enduros have a noticeable advantage. In short: You get a lot of motorbike for comparatively little money. What is on offer probably satisfies the majority of enduro riders. So if you don't care about your ego when buying and look at the facts soberly, it's hard to get past the Xtrainer.

playful handling

accessible seat geometry

perfectly controllable engine

smooth running and torque-oriented

favourable purchase price

electronically controlled oil injection

long maintenance intervals

all-round uncomplicated machine.

Suspension at the limit in fast sections

less ground clearance compared to KTM & Husqvarna Hardenduros.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Beta Alp 4.0 vs Beta Xtrainer 300

Price Beta Alp 4.0

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Beta Xtrainer 300

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons