Yamaha MT-03 2024 vs. Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2018

Yamaha MT-03 2024

Yamaha MT-03 2024

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2018

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2018

Loading...

Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-03 2024 compared to Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2018

Yamaha MT-03 2024
Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2018

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore68 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke44.1 mmStroke53.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power42 HPEngine power118 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,750 rpmRpm at Max. Power12,000 rpm
TorqueTorque29.6 NmTorque77 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,000 rpmRpm at Torque9,400 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.2 Compression Ratio12.65
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement321 ccmDisplacement765 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel130 mmTravel115 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel125 mmTravel134 mm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake65 degreeRake66.1 degree
TrailTrail95 mmTrail100 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter298 mmDiameter310 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter220 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,090 mmLength2,065 mm
HeightHeight1,035 mmHeight1,085 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,380 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height780 mmSeat Height825 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity17.4 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha MT-03 2024

Yamaha MT-03 2024

The MT-03 remains Yamaha's most accessible and pragmatic Hyper Naked in the segment. It scores with its low seat height, the easily controllable power of the two-cylinder and at the same time offers enough comfort for commuters. What it may lack in sportiness, it makes up for in comfort, making it perfect for people looking for a well-functioning motorbike with a brutal look. However, you shouldn't be too big, and you shouldn't aspire to keep up with the other models in the MT range at the angle - because that's not what it was designed for. The 2020 model year is thus a coherent update that is sure to make its buyers happy.

Easily controlled power

low seat height

easy to ride

low fuel consumption

neatly readable LC display

aggressive look

acute knee angle for tall people

soft chassis compared to other Yamaha MT models

not necessarily the most emotional motorbike

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2018

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2018

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha MT-03 vs Triumph Street Triple 765 R

Price Yamaha MT-03

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Street Triple 765 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons