Hyosung GV 300 S Aquila 2024 vs. Benda Rock 300 2025

Hyosung GV 300 S Aquila 2024

Hyosung GV 300 S Aquila 2024

Benda Rock 300 2025

Benda Rock 300 2025

Loading...

Overview - Hyosung GV 300 S Aquila 2024 vs Benda Rock 300 2025

Hyosung GV 300 S Aquila 2024

Hyosung GV 300 S Aquila 2024

Benda Rock 300 2025

Benda Rock 300 2025

Technical Specifications Hyosung GV 300 S Aquila 2024 compared to Benda Rock 300 2025

Hyosung GV 300 S Aquila 2024
Benda Rock 300 2025

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeVEngine typeV
Engine powerEngine power29.4 HPEngine power30.6 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpm
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionBelt
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement296 ccmDisplacement298 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberDual ShockShock absorberDual Shock

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeSingle disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width130 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height80 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter16 inchFront tyre diameter16 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter15 inchRear tyre diameter16 inch
Seat HeightSeat Height740 mmSeat Height720 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity12.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l
Top SpeedTop Speed128 km/hTop Speed129 km/h

Alternative Comparisons