Yamaha YZF-R6 2017 vs. Kawasaki Z900 2025

Yamaha YZF-R6 2017

Yamaha YZF-R6 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2025

Kawasaki Z900 2025

Loading...

Technical Specifications Yamaha YZF-R6 2017 compared to Kawasaki Z900 2025

Yamaha YZF-R6 2017
Kawasaki Z900 2025
Yamaha YZF-R6 2017
Yamaha YZF-R6 2017
Kawasaki Z900 2025
Kawasaki Z900 2025

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore67 mmBore73.4 mm
StrokeStroke42.5 mmStroke56 mm
Engine powerEngine power124 HPEngine power124 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power14,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpm
TorqueTorque65.7 NmTorque97.4 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque10,500 rpmRpm at Torque7,700 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13 Compression Ratio11.8
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionTransistorIgnitionDigital
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement599 ccmDisplacement948 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeDeltaboxFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,040 mmLength2,065 mm
WidthWidth705 mmWidth830 mm
HeightHeight1,095 mmHeight1,075 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,375 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height850 mmSeat Height830 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha YZF-R6 2017

Yamaha YZF-R6 2017

The Yamaha R6 2017 is still a visually and dynamically radical supersport motorbike that is one of the best and probably the last of its kind. The EURO4 standard costs the 599 cubic in-line four-cylinder with titanium valves a whole 11 hp compared to the 2007/2008 model. Yamaha is clearly targeting hobby, amateur and professional racers who don't care about standard performance anyway. With more than 50 accessories, the R6 can be upgraded according to need and budget. However, everyone should be aware that this can cost a lot of money.

Strong, direct brakes

sharp looks

automatic gearshift

good wind protection

precise handling

high transparency

radical seating position unsuitable for touring

standard power only 118.4 hp

upgrade cost-intensive

Kawasaki Z900 2025

Kawasaki Z900 2025

The new Z900 masters the balancing act between modernisation and proven virtues remarkably well. The 6-axle IMU, the precise quickshifter and the new electronics package make it technically absolutely up-to-date, while the characterful four-cylinder engine loses none of its fascination despite Euro 5+. The harmonious setup of all components is particularly impressive: whether suspension, engine or ergonomics - the overall package is just right.

Harmonious engine with impressive acceleration in the mid-range

very well functioning quickshifter with precise responsiveness

mature riding performance with a good compromise between stability and nimble handling

sensitive 6-axle IMU with harmonious control

superbly tuned seating position

excellent engine reponsiveness

confident cornering behaviour with transparent feedback from the front

harmonious electronics that do not restrict riding pleasure

smooth transmission with perfectly tuned ratios

first-class stop-and-go behaviour in city traffic

intuitive bike for beginners and experienced riders

slim waist despite four-cylinder layout

Great 5 inch display but the possibilities are not perfectly utilised with the Rideology app

licence plate holder seems a little carelessly integrated into the design

fuel consumption in practice significantly higher than factory specification (6.0-6.5l instead of 4.8l)

suspension of the basic version a little stiff on poor asphalt

promised app functions not yet available at the time of testing

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha YZF-R6 vs Kawasaki Z900

Price Yamaha YZF-R6

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

Yamaha R7 2021
VS.
Yamaha YZF-R6 2020

Yamaha R7 2021 vs
Yamaha YZF-R6 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020
VS.
Kawasaki Z1000 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020 vs
Kawasaki Z1000 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2021
VS.
Suzuki GSX-S 750 2019

Kawasaki Z900 2021 vs
Suzuki GSX-S 750 2019

Kawasaki Z900 2021
VS.
Kawasaki Z 800 2016

Kawasaki Z900 2021 vs
Kawasaki Z 800 2016

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 2020
VS.
Yamaha YZF-R6 2020

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 2020 vs
Yamaha YZF-R6 2020

Yamaha YZF-R6 RACE 2021
VS.
Yamaha YZF-R6 2020

Yamaha YZF-R6 RACE 2021 vs
Yamaha YZF-R6 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2021
VS.
Honda CBR650R 2021

Kawasaki Z900 2021 vs
Honda CBR650R 2021

Yamaha YZF-R6 2020
VS.
Yamaha YZF-R3 2021

Yamaha YZF-R6 2020 vs
Yamaha YZF-R3 2021

Kawasaki Z900 2021
VS.
Kawasaki Z 750 2009

Kawasaki Z900 2021 vs
Kawasaki Z 750 2009

Yamaha YZF-R6 2020
VS.
Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2020

Yamaha YZF-R6 2020 vs
Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2020

Yamaha YZF-R6 2020
VS.
Kawasaki Ninja 125 2020

Yamaha YZF-R6 2020 vs
Kawasaki Ninja 125 2020

Aprilia RS 660 2021
VS.
Kawasaki Z900 2020

Aprilia RS 660 2021 vs
Kawasaki Z900 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020
VS.
Kawasaki Z900RS 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020 vs
Kawasaki Z900RS 2020