BMW G 450 X 2009 vs. Husqvarna TE 449 2012

BMW G 450 X 2009

BMW G 450 X 2009

Husqvarna TE 449 2012

Husqvarna TE 449 2012

Loading...

Technical Specifications BMW G 450 X 2009 compared to Husqvarna TE 449 2012

BMW G 450 X 2009
Husqvarna TE 449 2012

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore98 mmBore98 mm
StrokeStroke59.6 mmStroke59.6 mm
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement449.5 ccmDisplacement449.6 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandMarzocchiBrandKayaba

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandMarzocchiBrandKayaba

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

LengthLength2,200 mmLength2,280 mm
WidthWidth806 mmWidth820 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,475 mmWheelbase1,490 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height955 mmSeat Height963 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity8 lFuel Tank Capacity8.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW G 450 X 2009

BMW G 450 X 2009

Orange fans will also take BMW's sport duro very seriously since Andreas Lettenbichler's great performance with his G 450 X at Erzberg. Because while the other top riders stormed to the top with lighter two-strokes, Letti rode a 450 four-stroke all the way to the top.

Electronic fuel injection from engine

improved rear traction

nimbler handling

innovation.

More aggressive engine response

unfamiliar handling.

Husqvarna TE 449 2012

Husqvarna TE 449 2012

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Alternative Comparisons