Suzuki GSR 600 2006 vs. Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Suzuki GSR 600 2006

Suzuki GSR 600 2006

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Loading...

Technical Specifications Suzuki GSR 600 2006 compared to Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Suzuki GSR 600 2006
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power98 HPEngine power135 HP
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement599 ccmDisplacement1,050 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,400 mmWheelbase1,435 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height785 mmSeat Height825 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Suzuki GSR 600 2006

Suzuki GSR 600 2006

The naked Suzuki has not been spared in any neuralgic areas. On the road, you enjoy the high-quality engine and chassis. It is super agile in tight corners and fast and stable in wide radii.

Rev-hungry engine

stable and lively at the same time

excellent overall package

clearly lacks wind protection

USD fork would suit it well.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

More power, more kilos, more rubber . It is certainly not the most manageable, which makes climbing the Tyrolean mountains over hundreds of hairpin bends exhausting at times. But it is more mature than the Street Triple, knows how to glide along the valley smoothly and without getting on your nerves, and for some reason feels more trustworthy and secure.

Powerful three-cylinder engine

sporty driving feel

upright seating

stable frame.

Showa suspension elements slightly uncomfortable

stubborn handling.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki GSR 600 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Price Suzuki GSR 600

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons