Honda CB500F 2013 vs. Kawasaki ER-6n 2008

Honda CB500F 2013

Honda CB500F 2013

Kawasaki ER-6n 2008

Kawasaki ER-6n 2008

Loading...

Technical Specifications Honda CB500F 2013 compared to Kawasaki ER-6n 2008

Honda CB500F 2013
Kawasaki ER-6n 2008

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power48 HPEngine power72 HP
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement471 ccmDisplacement649 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,405 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height790 mmSeat Height785 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15.7 lFuel Tank Capacity15.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Honda CB500F 2013

Honda CB500F 2013

However, such minor details cannot tarnish the good image of the Honda CB500F. After the first few metres, there was no question that it would be an excellent choice as an entry-level motorbike. But the fact that it can also meet higher demands is a little surprising, especially the engine pleases with its agile response and pronounced revving pleasure.

Relatively low overall weight

agile

nimble handling

acceptable chassis

good comfort

strong engine

successful seating position.

Partially shoddy workmanship

lack of gear indicator.

Kawasaki ER-6n 2008

Kawasaki ER-6n 2008

Kawasaki doesn't build toys. The ER-6N is getting more serious - and remains beginner-friendly.

Lightness

precision

rideability

modern, dynamic look

beginner-friendly

trustworthy ergonomics

ABS.

Sitting position with regard to the footrests uncomfortable from 1.80m

hardly suitable for wheelies

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Honda CB500F vs Kawasaki ER-6n

Price Honda CB500F

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki ER-6n

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons