KTM 250 EXC 2010 vs. Husqvarna WR 300 2013

KTM 250 EXC 2010

KTM 250 EXC 2010

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Loading...

Technical Specifications KTM 250 EXC 2010 compared to Husqvarna WR 300 2013

KTM 250 EXC 2010
Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore66.4 mmBore72 mm
StrokeStroke72 mmStroke72 mm
StarterStarterKickStarterKick
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement249 ccmDisplacement293 ccm

Suspension Front

BrandBrandWPBrandKayaba

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandWPBrandKayaba

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height80 %
WheelbaseWheelbase1,475 mmWheelbase1,465 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height985 mmSeat Height975 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight100.8 kgDry Weight103 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9.5 lFuel Tank Capacity9.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 250 EXC 2010

KTM 250 EXC 2010

Even if the changes to the EXCs this year are limited, when it comes to Enduro, KTM is still the benchmark to measure itself against. Especially in the 2-stroke sector, there is still a lot of development going on.

Improved design

convincing gearbox

optimal gears

acceptable performance.

Chassis could be made a little more sophisticated.

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 250 EXC vs Husqvarna WR 300

Price KTM 250 EXC

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna WR 300

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons