Kawasaki ER-6n 2010 vs. Triumph Street Triple 2013

Kawasaki ER-6n 2010

Kawasaki ER-6n 2010

Triumph Street Triple 2013

Triumph Street Triple 2013

Loading...

Technical Specifications Kawasaki ER-6n 2010 compared to Triumph Street Triple 2013

Kawasaki ER-6n 2010
Triumph Street Triple 2013
Kawasaki ER-6n 2010
Kawasaki ER-6n 2010
Triumph Street Triple 2013
Triumph Street Triple 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore83 mmBore74 mm
StrokeStroke60 mmStroke52.3 mm
Engine powerEngine power72 HPEngine power106 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,850 rpm
TorqueTorque66 NmTorque68 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,000 rpmRpm at Torque9,750 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.3 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders3
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement649 ccmDisplacement675 ccm

Brakes Front

PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height55 %
LengthLength2,100 mmLength2,055 mm
WidthWidth760 mmWidth740 mm
HeightHeight1,100 mmHeight1,060 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height790 mmSeat Height800 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight204 kgKerb Weight183 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17.4 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki ER-6n 2010

Kawasaki ER-6n 2010

You won't find such a coherent package with such fine details anywhere else at this price. The ER-6n has become a little sharper again, both visually and dynamically, and is more fun than ever.

ABS

wider handlebars

slimmer waist

increased intake noise

comfortable seat

uncomplicated chassis.

None

Triumph Street Triple 2013

Triumph Street Triple 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki ER-6n vs Triumph Street Triple

Price Kawasaki ER-6n

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Street Triple

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

Kawasaki ER-6f 2016
VS.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Kawasaki ER-6f 2016 vs
Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013
VS.
Triumph Street Triple 2013

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 vs
Triumph Street Triple 2013

Triumph Street Triple 2010
VS.
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2010

Triumph Street Triple 2010 vs
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2010

Kawasaki ER-5 2005
VS.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2007

Kawasaki ER-5 2005 vs
Kawasaki ER-6n 2007

Triumph Street Triple 2014
VS.
Triumph Street Triple R 2019

Triumph Street Triple 2014 vs
Triumph Street Triple R 2019

Triumph Street Triple 2016
VS.
Triumph Daytona 675 2016

Triumph Street Triple 2016 vs
Triumph Daytona 675 2016

Triumph Street Triple 2014
VS.
Triumph Trident 660 2021

Triumph Street Triple 2014 vs
Triumph Trident 660 2021

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016
VS.
Yamaha XJ6 2016

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016 vs
Yamaha XJ6 2016

Kawasaki ER-6n 2009
VS.
Kawasaki Z 750 2009

Kawasaki ER-6n 2009 vs
Kawasaki Z 750 2009

Triumph Street Triple 2011
VS.
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2011

Triumph Street Triple 2011 vs
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2011

Triumph Street Triple 2013
VS.
Triumph Street Triple R 2017

Triumph Street Triple 2013 vs
Triumph Street Triple R 2017

Kawasaki Versys 650 2009
VS.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2010

Kawasaki Versys 650 2009 vs
Kawasaki ER-6n 2010

Kawasaki ER-6n 2010
VS.
Kawasaki Z 650 2020

Kawasaki ER-6n 2010 vs
Kawasaki Z 650 2020