CFMOTO 675NK 2025 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2016

CFMOTO 675NK 2025

CFMOTO 675NK 2025

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Loading...

Technical Specifications CFMOTO 675NK 2025 compared to Yamaha MT-09 2016

CFMOTO 675NK 2025
Yamaha MT-09 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore72 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke55.2 mmStroke59.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power90 HPEngine power115 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque68 NmTorque87.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,250 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio11.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping, Clutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
DisplacementDisplacement675 ccmDisplacement847 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,020 mmLength2,075 mm
WidthWidth849 mmWidth815 mm
HeightHeight1,155 mmHeight1,135 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,400 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height810 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)189 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)191 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2, ALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

CFMOTO 675NK 2025

CFMOTO 675NK 2025

The CFMOTO 675NK is a successful naked bike for solo riders who are looking for something independent. It offers plenty of features, good riding performance and a cool look - with minor weaknesses in engine tuning and comfort. But you can forgive it a lot when you first read the price tag and then hear the purring of the three-cylinder engine.

Three-cylinder engine with a throaty sound

Modern design & high-quality workmanship

Easy-to-read 5-inch TFT display

Upright seating position

Two-stage, disengageable traction control & ABS

Load change reactions below 4,000 rpm

no ride-by-wire

quickshifter only for upshifting

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

The Yamaha MT-09 did not need to be reinvented for the coming season - it already was extremely well done almost four years ago. Instead, the Japanese focus on fine-tuning and adding practical, contemporary gimmicks such as traction control and automatic shifting. Due to the Euro4 standard, however, the engine management has been changed once again and offers an emphatically powerful but well controllable power delivery in standard mode; the power explosion of the first generation is now no longer offered even by the sharper A mode. The biggest change, recognisable at first glance, is the, in my opinion, extremely successful design with the more aggressive front and the newly designed rear. All in all, an even snazzier naked bike that was clearly built for the fun of motorcycling.

Wonderfully powerful three-cylinder powerplant

three power modes

fully adjustable chassis

quickshifter as standard

sporty upright seating position

good brakes

aggressive looks

traction control.

Saddle a little too hard for long tours

licence plate holder on the swingarm offers less splash protection than a conventional one

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price CFMOTO 675NK vs Yamaha MT-09

Price CFMOTO 675NK

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons