Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 vs. BMW S 1000 RR 2010

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

Loading...

Technical Specifications Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 compared to BMW S 1000 RR 2010

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013
BMW S 1000 RR 2010

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore79 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke71.4 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power135 HPEngine power192 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,400 rpmRpm at Max. Power13,000 rpm
TorqueTorque111 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,750 rpmRpm at Torque9,750 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio13
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders4
DisplacementDisplacement1,050 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFixed caliper
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
LengthLength2,100 mmLength2,056 mm
WidthWidth795 mmWidth826 mm
HeightHeight1,110 mmHeight1,138 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,435 mmWheelbase1,432 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height825 mmSeat Height820 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight214 kgKerb Weight204 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

More power, more kilos, more rubber . It is certainly not the most manageable, which makes climbing the Tyrolean mountains over hundreds of hairpin bends exhausting at times. But it is more mature than the Street Triple, knows how to glide along the valley smoothly and without getting on your nerves, and for some reason feels more trustworthy and secure.

Powerful three-cylinder engine

sporty driving feel

upright seating

stable frame.

Showa suspension elements slightly uncomfortable

stubborn handling.

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

We have a strict and merciless order from the boss to thank for that. There are tough performance checks before the S 1000 RR leaves the factory. At BMW, they didn't want to show their hand and risk even one disappointing test bench report finding its way into the media.

Superior performance

well-functioning driving aids

very fast

optimal price.

Agility

complicated handling

braking stability

high weight.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050 vs BMW S 1000 RR

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 RR

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons