Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2025 vs. Brixton Crossfire 500 2023

Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2025

Brixton Crossfire 500 2023
Loading...
Technical Specifications Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2025 compared to Brixton Crossfire 500 2023
Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2025
Brixton Crossfire 500 2023
Engine and Drive Train
| Engine type | Engine type | In line | Engine type | In line |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engine power | Engine power | 47 HP | Engine power | 48 HP |
| Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 7,250 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 8,500 rpm |
| Torque | Torque | 52.3 Nm | Torque | 43 Nm |
| Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 5,150 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 6,750 rpm |
| Fuel system | Fuel system | Injection | Fuel system | Injection |
| Starter | Starter | Electric | Starter | Electric |
| Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
| Transmission Type | Transmission Type | Gearshift | Transmission Type | Gearshift |
| Number of gears | Number of gears | 6 | Number of gears | 6 |
| Cylinders | Cylinders | 2 | Cylinders | 2 |
| Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
| Cooling | Cooling | Oil-air | Cooling | liquid |
| Displacement | Displacement | 648 ccm | Displacement | 486 ccm |
Suspension Front
| Front suspension | Front suspension | Telescopic fork | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork |
|---|
Suspension Rear
| Suspension | Suspension | Swing arm | Suspension | Swing arm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shock absorber | Shock absorber | Dual Shock | Shock absorber | Monoshock |
| Material | Material | Steel | Material | Steel |
Chassis
| Frame | Frame | Steel | Frame | Steel |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frame type | Frame type | Double cradle | Frame type | Double cradle |
Brakes Front
| Type | Type | Single disk | Type | Single disk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter | Diameter | 320 mm | Diameter | 320 mm |
| Actuation | Actuation | Hydraulic | Actuation | Hydraulic |
Brakes Rear
| Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter | Diameter | 240 mm | Diameter | 240 mm |
Assistance Systems
| Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | ABS | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | ABS |
|---|
Dimensions and Weights
| Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 100 mm | Front tyre width | 120 mm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 90 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
| Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 18 inch | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch |
| Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 130 mm | Rear tyre width | 160 mm |
| Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 70 % | Rear tyre height | 60 % |
| Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 18 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
| Length | Length | 2,119 mm | Length | 2,117 mm |
| Width | Width | 835 mm | Width | 757 mm |
| Height | Height | 1,067 mm | Height | 1,116 mm |
| Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,398 mm | Wheelbase | 1,416 mm |
| Seat Height | Seat Height | 805 mm | Seat Height | 795 mm |
| Kerb Weight (with ABS) | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 217 kg | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 190 kg |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 13.7 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 13.5 l |
| Range | Range | 326 km | Range | 337 km |
| Combined CO2 emissions | Combined CO2 emissions | 99 g/km | Combined CO2 emissions | 92 g/km |
| Combined fuel consumption | Combined fuel consumption | 4.2 l/100km | Combined fuel consumption | 4 l/100km |
| Stationary noise | Stationary noise | 88.98 dB | Stationary noise | 89 dB |
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 vs Brixton Crossfire 500
Price Royal Enfield Interceptor 650
Model year
Current average market prices
Price Brixton Crossfire 500
Model year
Current average market prices





















