KTM 690 Enduro R 2022 vs. Daelim Daystar 125 2009

KTM 690 Enduro R 2022

KTM 690 Enduro R 2022

Daelim Daystar 125 2009

Daelim Daystar 125 2009

Loading...

Technical Specifications KTM 690 Enduro R 2022 compared to Daelim Daystar 125 2009

KTM 690 Enduro R 2022
Daelim Daystar 125 2009

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power75 HPEngine power13 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,700 rpm
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement692.7 ccmDisplacement125 ccm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeDrum

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter15 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,502 mmWheelbase1,505 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height929 mmSeat Height725 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity13.5 lFuel Tank Capacity16.8 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA1

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 690 Enduro R 2022

KTM 690 Enduro R 2022

The KTM 690 Enduro R is the perfect bike for riders who find a touring enduro too heavy, but a hard enduro too uncomfortable and maintenance-intensive. The new electronic features make the bike very accessible even to inexperienced riders. The smooth-running, cultivated engine, together with the perfectly tuned gearbox and overall gratifyingly low vibration level, also makes long tours possible without any problems.

Superb engine

Enduro ABS

easy-to-use traction control

successful gearbox and transmission set-up

well-tuned automatic gearshift incl. blipper

fully adjustable chassis.

Relatively high weight for an enduro

suspension response not at top level

Daelim Daystar 125 2009

Daelim Daystar 125 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 690 Enduro R vs Daelim Daystar 125

Price KTM 690 Enduro R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Daelim Daystar 125

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons