Triumph Tiger 800 2011 vs. Triumph Tiger 1050 2012

Triumph Tiger 800 2011

Triumph Tiger 1050 2012
Loading...
Technical Specifications Triumph Tiger 800 2011 compared to Triumph Tiger 1050 2012
Triumph Tiger 800 2011
Triumph Tiger 1050 2012
Engine and Drive Train
Engine type | Engine type | In line | Engine type | In line |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bore | Bore | 74 mm | Bore | 79 mm |
Stroke | Stroke | 61.9 mm | Stroke | 71.4 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 95 HP | Engine power | 115 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 9,300 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 9,400 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 79 Nm | Torque | 100 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 7,850 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 6,250 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 12 | Compression Ratio | 12 |
Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath |
Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
Number of gears | Number of gears | 6 | Number of gears | 6 |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 3 | Cylinders | 3 |
Valves | Valves | DOHC | Valves | DOHC |
Cooling | Cooling | liquid | Cooling | liquid |
Displacement | Displacement | 799 ccm | Displacement | 1,050 ccm |
Suspension Front
Brand | Brand | Showa | Brand | Showa |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adjustment | Adjustment | Rebound | Adjustment | Compression, Rebound |
Suspension Rear
Brand | Brand | Showa | Brand | Showa |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adjustment | Adjustment | Rebound | Adjustment | Compression, Rebound |
Brakes Front
Piston | Piston | Four pistons | Piston | Four pistons |
---|---|---|---|---|
Technology | Technology | radial | Technology | radial |
Brand | Brand | Nissin | Brand | Nissin |
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Single piston | Piston | Double piston |
Shock mount | Shock mount | Floating caliper | Shock mount | Floating caliper |
Brand | Brand | Nissin | Brand | Nissin |
Assistance Systems
Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | ABS | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | ABS |
---|
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 110 mm | Front tyre width | 120 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 80 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 19 inch | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 150 mm | Rear tyre width | 180 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 70 % | Rear tyre height | 55 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Length | Length | 2,215 mm | Length | 2,110 mm |
Width | Width | 795 mm | Width | 840 mm |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,555 mm | Wheelbase | 1,510 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 830 mm | Seat Height | 835 mm |
Kerb Weight | Kerb Weight | 210 kg | Kerb Weight | 198 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 20 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A | License compliancy | A |
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Triumph Tiger 800 2011

It seems Triumph has built a motorbike that has made the most pronounced trait in wildcats - suppleness - the overriding principle of its dynamics. The Tiger is elegant, controlled and deliberate in the use of its power.
Homogeneous power development
smooth ride
loud sound
ABS.
Gearbox somewhat stiff during lively gear changes.
Triumph Tiger 1050 2012

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Tiger 800 vs Triumph Tiger 1050
Price Triumph Tiger 800
Model year
Current average market prices
Price Triumph Tiger 1050
Model year
Current average market prices