SWM RS 650 R 2017 vs. Beta Alp 4.0 2013

SWM RS 650 R 2017

SWM RS 650 R 2017

Beta Alp 4.0 2013

Beta Alp 4.0 2013

Loading...

Technical Specifications SWM RS 650 R 2017 compared to Beta Alp 4.0 2013

SWM RS 650 R 2017
Beta Alp 4.0 2013

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore100 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke76.4 mmStroke71.2 mm
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement600 ccmDisplacement349 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width130 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height90 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,505 mmWheelbase1,444 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height900 mmSeat Height863 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight144 kgDry Weight133 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity12 lFuel Tank Capacity10.5 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price SWM RS 650 R vs Beta Alp 4.0

Price SWM RS 650 R

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Beta Alp 4.0

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons