Yamaha XSR700 2025 vs. Honda CBR1000RR-R Fireblade SP Carbon Edition 2025

Yamaha XSR700 2025

Honda CBR1000RR-R Fireblade SP Carbon Edition 2025

Overview - Yamaha XSR700 2025 vs Honda CBR1000RR-R Fireblade SP Carbon Edition 2025

Yamaha XSR700 2025

Honda CBR1000RR-R Fireblade SP Carbon Edition 2025

Technical Specifications Yamaha XSR700 2025 compared to Honda CBR1000RR-R Fireblade SP Carbon Edition 2025

Yamaha XSR700 2025

Honda CBR1000RR-R Fireblade SP Carbon Edition 2025

Yamaha XSR700 2025

Honda CBR1000RR-R Fireblade SP Carbon Edition 2025

Engine and Drive Train

Engine type	Engine type	In line	Engine type	In line
Bore	Bore	80 mm	Bore	81 mm
Stroke	Stroke	68.6 mm	Stroke	48.5 mm
Engine power	Engine power	73.4 HP	Engine power	217 HP
Rpm at Max. Power	Rpm at Max. Power	8,750 rpm	Rpm at Max. Power	14,000 rpm
Torque	Torque	67 Nm	Torque	113 Nm
Rpm at Torque	Rpm at Torque	6,500 rpm	Rpm at Torque	12,000 rpm
Compression Ratio	Compression Ratio	11.5	Compression Ratio	13.6
Fuel system	Fuel system	Injection	Fuel system	Injection
Starter	Starter	Electric	Starter	Electric
Clutch Type	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
Ignition	Ignition	Transistor	Ignition	Digital, Transistor
Transmission	Transmission	Chain	Transmission	Chain
Transmission Type	Transmission Type	Gearshift	Transmission Type	Gearshift
Number of gears	Number of gears	6	Number of gears	6
Cylinders	Cylinders	2	Cylinders	4
Strokes	Strokes	4-Stroke	Strokes	4-Stroke
Valves per cylinder	Valves per cylinder	4	Valves per cylinder	4
Valves	Valves	DOHC	Valves	DOHC
Cooling	Cooling	liquid	Cooling	liquid
Displacement	Displacement	689 ccm	Displacement	1,000 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Telescopic fork	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork
Travel	Travel	130 mm	Travel	125 mm

Suspension Rear

Suspension	Suspension	Swing arm	Suspension	Swing arm
Shock absorber	Shock absorber	Monoshock	Shock absorber	Monoshock
Travel	Travel	130 mm	Travel	143 mm

Chassis

Frame	Frame	Steel	Frame	Aluminium
Rake	Rake	65.5 degree	Rake	65.3 degree
Trail	Trail	90 mm	Trail	101.9 mm

Brakes Front

Type	Type	Double disk	Type	Double disk
Diameter	Diameter	298 mm	Diameter	330 mm
Piston	Piston	Four pistons	Piston	Four pistons
Actuation	Actuation	Hydraulic	Actuation	Hydraulic

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc
Diameter	Diameter	245 mm	Diameter	220 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance Systems	Advanced Rider Assistance Systems	ABS	Advanced Rider Assistance Systems	Suspension electronically adjustable, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Launch-Control, Ride by Wire, Shift assistant with blipper, Traction control, Anti-wheelie

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	120 mm	Front tyre width	120 mm
Front tyre height	Front tyre height	70 %	Front tyre height	70 %
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	17 inch	Front tyre diameter	17 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	180 mm	Rear tyre width	200 mm
Rear tyre height	Rear tyre height	55 %	Rear tyre height	55 %
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	17 inch	Rear tyre diameter	17 inch
Length	Length	2,075 mm	Length	2,105 mm
Width	Width	820 mm	Width	750 mm
Height	Height	1,130 mm	Height	1,140 mm
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,405 mm	Wheelbase	1,455 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	835 mm	Seat Height	830 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)	Kerb Weight (with ABS)	188 kg	Kerb Weight (with ABS)	200 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	14 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	16.5 l
License compliancy	License compliancy	A	License compliancy	A
Range	Range	325 km	Range	246 km
Combined CO2 emissions	Combined CO2 emissions	100 g/km	Combined CO2 emissions	155 g/km
Combined fuel consumption	Combined fuel consumption	4.3 l/100km	Combined fuel consumption	6.7 l/100km

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha XSR700 2025

Can do everything but nothing well? A clear NO! The lively and agile retro bike with a sufficiently powerful engine can be a good all-rounder, which also looks good and tempts you to heat up the curves. Overall, the bike is fantastically manageable and sporty for me, even as a woman. The engine works better than expected and the seating position is more than comfortable. However, there is still room for improvement in terms of lean angle. I think that many people will continue to choose this bike because you simply can't go far wrong.

successful design

proven CP2 engine

comfortable seating position

an all-rounder suitable for every situation on the road

Display difficult to read

Relatively soft chassis

Rather little lean angle clearance