Royal Enfield Shotgun 650 2025 vs. Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2021

Royal Enfield Shotgun 650 2025

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2021

Overview - Royal Enfield Shotgun 650 2025 vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2021

Royal Enfield Shotgun 650 2025

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2021

Stylish and practical: PRO tank bags from SW-MOTECH

Simple attachment thanks to magnetic snap-in closure. For safe luggage transport.

Details

Technical Specifications Royal Enfield Shotgun 650 2025 compared to Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2021

Royal Enfield Shotgun 650 2025

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2021

Royal Enfield Shotgun 650 2025

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2021

Engine and Drive Train

Engine type	Engine type	In line	Engine type	In line crankpin offset
Bore	Bore	78 mm	Bore	78 mm
Stroke	Stroke	67.8 mm	Stroke	67.8 mm
Engine power	Engine power	47 HP	Engine power	48 HP
Rpm at Max. Power	Rpm at Max. Power	7,250 rpm	Rpm at Max. Power	7,150 rpm
Torque	Torque	52.3 Nm	Torque	52 Nm
Rpm at Torque	Rpm at Torque	5,650 rpm	Rpm at Torque	5,150 rpm
Compression Ratio	Compression Ratio	9.5	Compression Ratio	9.5
Fuel system	Fuel system	Injection	Fuel system	Injection
Starter	Starter	Electric	Starter	Electric, Kick
Clutch Type	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath
Transmission	Transmission	Chain	Transmission	Chain
Transmission Type	Transmission Type	Gearshift	Transmission Type	Gearshift
Number of gears	Number of gears	6	Number of gears	6
Cylinders	Cylinders	2	Cylinders	2
Strokes	Strokes	4-Stroke	Strokes	4-Stroke
Valves	Valves	OHC	Valves	OHV
Cooling	Cooling	Oil-air	Cooling	Oil-air
Displacement	Displacement	648 ccm	Displacement	648 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork	Front suspension	Telescopic fork
Travel	Travel	120 mm	Travel	130 mm

Suspension Rear

Shock absorber	Shock absorber	Dual Shock	Shock absorber	Dual Shock
Travel	Travel	90 mm	Travel	120 mm
Material	Material	Steel	Material	Steel

Chassis

Frame	Frame	Steel	Frame	Steel
Frame type	Frame type	Double cradle	Frame type	Load-bearing engine

Brakes Front

Type	Type	Double disk	Type	Single disk
Diameter	Diameter	320 mm	Diameter	320 mm
Piston	Piston	Double piston	Piston	Double piston

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc
Diameter	Diameter	300 mm	Diameter	240 mm
Piston	Piston	Double piston	Piston	Single piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance Systems	Advanced Rider Assistance Systems	ABS	Advanced Rider Assistance Systems	ABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	100 mm	Front tyre width	100 mm
Front tyre height	Front tyre height	90 %	Front tyre height	90 %
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	18 inch	Front tyre diameter	18 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	150 mm	Rear tyre width	130 mm
Rear tyre height	Rear tyre height	70 %	Rear tyre height	70 %
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	17 inch	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch
Length	Length	2,220 mm	Length	2,119 mm
Width	Width	820 mm	Width	745 mm
Height	Height	1,105 mm	Height	1,067 mm
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,465 mm	Wheelbase	1,398 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	795 mm	Seat Height	820 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)	Kerb Weight (with ABS)	240 kg	Kerb Weight (with ABS)	212 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	13.8 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	12.5 l
Range	Range	303 km	Range	296 km
Combined CO2 emissions	Combined CO2 emissions	99 g/km	Combined CO2 emissions	99 g/km
Combined fuel consumption	Combined fuel consumption	4.55 l/100km	Combined fuel consumption	4.21 l/100km
Stationary noise	Stationary noise	75.5 dB	Stationary noise	89 dB

Pros and Cons in comparison

Royal Enfield Shotgun 650 2025

Deceleration on two wheels with heart and character. It is a bike for anyone who wants to feel the wind, enjoy the landscape and unwind. With its relaxed power, classic cruiser look and solid workmanship, it captures the hearts of purists who are looking for the original.

Relaxed riding comfort

Classic cruiser design

Solid workmanship

Strong riding experience

Favourable price

Modern features (USB, LED lights)

Easy handling

Comfortable seating position for long rides

Above-average fuel consumption

Limited luggage options

Weak front brakes

Uncomfortable knee angle on long journeys