BMW F 650 GS 2012 vs. Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2024

BMW F 650 GS 2012

BMW F 650 GS 2012

Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2024

Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2024

Loading...

Overview - BMW F 650 GS 2012 vs Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2024

BMW F 650 GS 2012

BMW F 650 GS 2012

Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2024

Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2024

Technical Specifications BMW F 650 GS 2012 compared to Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2024

BMW F 650 GS 2012
Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2024

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore82 mmBore84 mm
StrokeStroke75.6 mmStroke81.5 mm
Engine powerEngine power71 HPEngine power40 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpm
TorqueTorque75 NmTorque40 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque4,500 rpmRpm at Torque5,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio11.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
LubricationLubricationDry sumpLubricationDry sump
DisplacementDisplacement798 ccmDisplacement452 ccm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTubular, Load-bearing engineFrame typeTwin-Spar

Brakes Front

PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width100 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height80 %Front tyre height90 %
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height80 %
LengthLength2,280 mmLength2,245 mm
WidthWidth890 mmWidth852 mm
HeightHeight1,240 mmHeight1,316 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,575 mmWheelbase1,510 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height790 mmSeat Height825 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l
Top SpeedTop Speed185 km/hTop Speed151 km/h
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW F 650 GS 2012

BMW F 650 GS 2012

When it comes to optional extras, accessories and driver equipment, BMW is the benchmark for us. The driver can have his vehicle configured exactly to his wishes and also order the matching clothing at the same time.

Manoeuvrability

agility

low seat height can be reduced again

heated grips

comfortable seat

resale value.

Wind protection somewhat suboptimal compared to the F800.

Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2024

Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2024

The Royal Enfield Himalayan 452 is a bike with a unique character that impresses with its accessibility and reliability. It is ideal for riders who are looking for an uncomplicated, yet powerful enduro bike that can cope with different types of terrain. Although it is not the most powerful or sporty bike, it impresses with its easy handling, robust construction and reliable electronics. Its suspension is stable at speed, but quickly reaches its limits. Overall, the Himalayan offers a pleasant riding experience for adventurers looking for a robust and good-natured machine.

Easy handling and accessible riding style

Robust and reliable suspension

Compact dimensions and low seat height make it accessible

Good travelling qualities as a comfortable companion

Not particularly powerful or sporty

suspension quickly reaches its limits under intensive use

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW F 650 GS vs Royal Enfield Himalayan 450

Price BMW F 650 GS

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Royal Enfield Himalayan 450

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH