KTM 990 Super Duke 2006 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2015

KTM 990 Super Duke 2006

KTM 990 Super Duke 2006

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

Loading...

Overview - KTM 990 Super Duke 2006 vs BMW S 1000 R 2015

KTM 990 Super Duke 2006

KTM 990 Super Duke 2006

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

Technical Specifications KTM 990 Super Duke 2006 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2015

KTM 990 Super Duke 2006
BMW S 1000 R 2015

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeVEngine typeIn line
BoreBore101 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke62.4 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power120 HPEngine power160 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque100 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,000 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio12
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter48 mmDiameter46 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameChromium-molybdenumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,438 mmWheelbase1,439 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height855 mmSeat Height814 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 990 Super Duke 2006

KTM 990 Super Duke 2006

You can still enter corners precisely or turn the bike on. You can still correct every radius with ease and at will. The Superduke is still more fun than having fun in your lederhosen. And you can still take on anyone with it.

High-performance device

extreme potential - not fully achievable.

Geometry

suboptimal ride comfort

design of the instruments.

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

The BMW S 1000 R impresses across the board and is much more than just a naked version of the S 1000 RR. With its own character, more torque in the mid-range and first-class electronics, it sets new standards in the high-performance Naked segment. The overall package of brutal performance, excellent suspension and practical everyday use makes it one of the best naked bikes ever - and at a surprisingly fair price.

Brutal performance with 160 Horsepower

Outstanding DDC suspension

Amazing stability at high speeds for a naked bike

Perfect electronics with sensitive DTC

Good price/performance ratio

Character despite perfection

Driving mode display font too small

Too extreme appearance for BMW traditionalists

Without equipment packages, important electronic features are missing

The price advantage is lost with full features

Price Comparison Average Market Price KTM 990 Super Duke vs BMW S 1000 R

Price KTM 990 Super Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons