Yamaha Aerox R 2013 vs. Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2017

Technical Specifications Yamaha Aerox R 2013 compared to Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2017

Yamaha Aerox R 2013

Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2017

Show all

Same only

Differences

Yamaha Aerox R 2013

Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine power	Engine power	2.72 HP	Engine power	4.5 HP
Rpm at Max. Power	Rpm at Max. Power	6,500 rpm	Rpm at Max. Power	8,700 rpm
Torque	Torque	3.7 Nm	Torque	4.3 Nm
Rpm at Torque	Rpm at Torque	4,500 rpm	Rpm at Torque	6,500 rpm
Starter	Starter	Kick	Starter	Kick
Transmission Type	Transmission Type	Automatic	Transmission Type	Automatic
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	2-Stroke	Strokes	2-Stroke
Cooling	Cooling	liquid	Cooling	Air
Displacement	Displacement	49.2 ccm	Displacement	49 ccm

Brakes Front

Type	Type	Single disk	Type	Single disk

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Drum

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	130 mm	Front tyre width	100 mm
Front tyre height	Front tyre height	60 %	Front tyre height	80 %
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	13 inch	Front tyre diameter	10 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	140 mm	Rear tyre width	120 mm
Rear tyre height	Rear tyre height	60 %	Rear tyre height	70 %
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	13 inch	Rear tyre diameter	10 inch
Length	Length	1,743 mm	Length	1,700 mm
Width	Width	690 mm	Width	680 mm
Height	Height	1,170 mm	Height	1,060 mm
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,256 mm	Wheelbase	1,200 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	828 mm	Seat Height	765 mm
Kerb Weight	Kerb Weight	97 kg	Kerb Weight	95 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	7 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	7.3 l
License compliancy	License compliancy	AM	License compliancy	AM