Husaberg TE 125 2012 vs. Husqvarna SM 125 S 2006

Husaberg TE 125 2012

Husaberg TE 125 2012

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2006

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2006

Loading...

Overview - Husaberg TE 125 2012 vs Husqvarna SM 125 S 2006

Husaberg TE 125 2012

Husaberg TE 125 2012

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2006

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2006

Technical Specifications Husaberg TE 125 2012 compared to Husqvarna SM 125 S 2006

Husaberg TE 125 2012
Husqvarna SM 125 S 2006

Engine and Drive Train

TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement124.8 ccmDisplacement125 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,475 mmWheelbase1,470 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height990 mmSeat Height870 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight97 kgDry Weight113.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity11 lFuel Tank Capacity10.2 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husaberg TE 125 2012

Husaberg TE 125 2012

The little one with the somewhat nervous temperament joined the Swedish family only last year. The 125 is certainly not the easiest Husaberg to ride, but if you can master the TE 125, you can master all the others.

Feather-light dry weight

nimble on the move.

Chassis needs getting used to

steep ascents complicated.

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2006

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2006

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH