Kawasaki ER-6n 2012 vs. Honda CBF 600 S 2013

Kawasaki ER-6n 2012

Honda CBF 600 S 2013
Loading...
Overview - Kawasaki ER-6n 2012 vs Honda CBF 600 S 2013

Kawasaki ER-6n 2012

Honda CBF 600 S 2013
Technical Specifications Kawasaki ER-6n 2012 compared to Honda CBF 600 S 2013
Kawasaki ER-6n 2012
Honda CBF 600 S 2013
Engine and Drive Train
Engine type | Engine type | In line | Engine type | In line |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bore | Bore | 83 mm | Bore | 67 mm |
Stroke | Stroke | 60 mm | Stroke | 42.5 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 72 HP | Engine power | 77.5 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 8,500 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 10,500 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 64 Nm | Torque | 59 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 7,000 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 8,250 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 10.8 | Compression Ratio | 11.6 |
Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath |
Ignition | Ignition | Digital | Ignition | Transistor |
Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 2 | Cylinders | 4 |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
Valves per cylinder | Valves per cylinder | 4 | Valves per cylinder | 4 |
Valves | Valves | DOHC | Valves | DOHC |
Cooling | Cooling | liquid | Cooling | liquid |
Displacement | Displacement | 649 ccm | Displacement | 599.3 ccm |
Chassis
Frame | Frame | Steel | Frame | Aluminium |
---|---|---|---|---|
Frame type | Frame type | Perimeter | Frame type | Backbone |
Brakes Front
Type | Type | Double disk | Type | Double disk |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Double piston | Piston | Three pistons |
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Single piston | Piston | Single piston |
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 120 mm | Front tyre width | 120 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 160 mm | Rear tyre width | 160 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 60 % | Rear tyre height | 60 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Length | Length | 2,110 mm | Length | 2,160 mm |
Width | Width | 770 mm | Width | 765 mm |
Height | Height | 1,110 mm | Height | 1,240 mm |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,410 mm | Wheelbase | 1,490 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 805 mm | Seat Height | 785 mm |
Kerb Weight (with ABS) | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 208 kg | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 222 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 16 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 20 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A | License compliancy | A |
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Kawasaki ER-6n 2012

The engine is hearty and a lot of fun, plus the ER shines with a Japanese meticulous finish and a fighting price.
Solid handling
high quality level
weak brake
Honda CBF 600 S 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki ER-6n vs Honda CBF 600 S
Price Kawasaki ER-6n
Model year
Current average market prices
Price Honda CBF 600 S
Model year
Current average market prices