Yamaha MT-10 2016 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2016

Yamaha MT-10 2016

Yamaha MT-10 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha MT-10 2016 vs BMW S 1000 R 2016

The Yamaha MT-10 and the BMW S 1000 R, both released in 2016, are two popular naked bikes in the market. While they share similar engine power and displacement, there are several notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine and drive train, both bikes feature an in-line 4-cylinder engine with 160 horsepower. The Yamaha MT-10 has a torque of 111 Nm, while the BMW S 1000 R boasts a slightly higher torque of 112 Nm. Both bikes have a displacement of around 1000cc, providing ample power for thrilling rides.

When it comes to suspension, both bikes are equipped with upside-down telescopic forks in the front and a swing arm with a monoshock in the rear. This ensures a smooth and stable ride, allowing riders to handle various road conditions with ease.

Yamaha MT-10 2016

Yamaha MT-10 2016

In terms of chassis, the Yamaha MT-10 features an aluminum frame type called Deltabox, which provides excellent rigidity and stability. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R has an aluminum frame type called Twin Tube, which also offers good stability but may have a slightly different feel during rides.

Both bikes come with double disk brakes in the front, ensuring powerful and reliable stopping power. Additionally, they both have advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS and traction control, enhancing safety and control during rides.

In terms of dimensions and weights, there are slight differences between the two models. The Yamaha MT-10 has a wheelbase of 1400 mm and a seat height of 825 mm, while the BMW S 1000 R has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1439 mm and a lower seat height of 814 mm. The kerb weight of the Yamaha MT-10 is 210 kg, slightly heavier than the BMW S 1000 R which weighs 207 kg. Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity of around 17 liters.

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

Now let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each bike. The Yamaha MT-10 is known for its CP4 engine, which gives it a strong character and an unmistakable sound. It is extremely agile and offers high-speed stability. The brakes on the MT-10 are also strong and reliable. However, the MT-10 lacks in terms of comfort, with limited wind protection and a hard fit.

On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R is praised for its powerful and well-controllable engine, providing a thrilling riding experience. It also boasts a powerful braking system and a comfortable seating position, making it suitable for longer rides. However, the S 1000 R may come with expensive optional extras, which can make it an expensive choice. Additionally, some riders have found the chassis to be on the harder side, which may affect the overall comfort of the bike.

In conclusion, both the Yamaha MT-10 and the BMW S 1000 R offer powerful and thrilling rides with their 160 horsepower engines. While the Yamaha MT-10 excels in agility and high-speed stability, the BMW S 1000 R offers a comfortable seating position and a well-controllable engine. Riders should consider their preferences for comfort, handling, and pricing when choosing between these two models.

Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-10 2016 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2016

Yamaha MT-10 2016
BMW S 1000 R 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore79 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke50.9 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power160 HPEngine power160 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque111 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,000 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement998 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter43 mmDiameter46 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDeltaboxFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspension

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,095 mmLength2,057 mm
WidthWidth800 mmWidth845 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,400 mmWheelbase1,439 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height825 mmSeat Height814 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)210 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)207 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha MT-10 2016

Yamaha MT-10 2016

The Yamaha MT-10 exudes a lot of emotion with the cool CP4 engine, but also doesn't forget pragmatic utility. For a naked bike, it offers a lot of comfort on long tours. It rides fast but is still refined at all times. On the racetrack, the chassis is not precise enough to beat the other Powernakeds. Overall, however, it scores with its versatility paired with radical looks and awesome sound.

great sound

pleasant wind protection

comfortable seating position even on long tours

great engine response

balanced overall package despite radical looks and wicked sound

Too inactive seating position on the racetrack

chassis and ride assistance systems sufficient for trackdays but not on the same level as the other Powernakeds.

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

The BMW S 1000 R impresses across the board and is much more than just a naked version of the S 1000 RR. With its own character, more torque in the mid-range and first-class electronics, it sets new standards in the high-performance Naked segment. The overall package of brutal performance, excellent suspension and practical everyday use makes it one of the best naked bikes ever - and at a surprisingly fair price.

Brutal performance with 160 Horsepower

Outstanding DDC suspension

Amazing stability at high speeds for a naked bike

Perfect electronics with sensitive DTC

Good price/performance ratio

Character despite perfection

Driving mode display font too small

Too extreme appearance for BMW traditionalists

Without equipment packages, important electronic features are missing

The price advantage is lost with full features

Price Comparison Average Market Price Yamaha MT-10 vs BMW S 1000 R

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha MT-10 2016 and a BMW S 1000 R 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2016 is about 12% higher. A Yamaha MT-10 2016 experiences a loss of 810 GBP in one year and 1,870 GBP in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 390 GBP and 1,960 GBP for a BMW S 1000 R 2016. Compared to BMW S 1000 R 2016 there are less Yamaha MT-10 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 7 compared to 10. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 69 days compared to 97 days for the Yamaha MT-10. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 32 reviews for the Yamaha MT-10 and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the Yamaha MT-10 was published on 17/11/2015 and now has more than 20,700 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 03/11/2013.

Price Yamaha MT-10

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons