Husaberg TE 250 2013 vs. Beta RR 520 4T 2011

Technical Specifications Husaberg TE 250 2013 compared to Beta RR 520 4T 2011

Husaberg TE 250 2013

Beta RR 520 4T 2011

Show all

Same only

Differences

Husaberg TE 250 2013

Beta RR 520 4T 2011

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	66 mm	Bore	100 mm
Stroke	Stroke	72 mm	Stroke	63.4 mm
Clutch Type	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	2-Stroke	Strokes	4-Stroke
Displacement	Displacement	249 ccm	Displacement	497.94 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

Frame	Frame	Steel	Frame	Steel
Frame type	Frame type	Central tube	Frame type	Double cradle

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	90 mm	Front tyre width	90 mm
Front tyre height	Front tyre height	90 %	Front tyre height	90 %
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	21 inch	Front tyre diameter	12 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	140 mm	Rear tyre width	140 mm
Rear tyre height	Rear tyre height	80 %	Rear tyre height	80 %
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,482 mm	Wheelbase	1,475 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	960 mm	Seat Height	940 mm
Dry Weight	Dry Weight	104 kg	Dry Weight	115.2 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	10.7 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	8 l