Beta RR 300 2T 2015 vs. Husqvarna TE 310 2011

Beta RR 300 2T 2015

Beta RR 300 2T 2015

Husqvarna TE 310 2011

Husqvarna TE 310 2011

Loading...

Overview - Beta RR 300 2T 2015 vs Husqvarna TE 310 2011

Beta RR 300 2T 2015

Beta RR 300 2T 2015

Husqvarna TE 310 2011

Husqvarna TE 310 2011

Technical Specifications Beta RR 300 2T 2015 compared to Husqvarna TE 310 2011

Beta RR 300 2T 2015
Husqvarna TE 310 2011

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore72 mmBore83 mm
StrokeStroke72 mmStroke55 mm
StarterStarterKickStarterKick
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement293.1 ccmDisplacement297 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width120 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height90 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,482 mmWheelbase1,495 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height930 mmSeat Height963 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight104 kgDry Weight111 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9.5 lFuel Tank Capacity7.2 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Beta RR 300 2T vs Husqvarna TE 310

Price Beta RR 300 2T

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna TE 310

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH