Kawasaki Z900 2025 vs. Aprilia RS 660 2025

Kawasaki Z900 2025

Aprilia RS 660 2025
Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z900 2025 compared to Aprilia RS 660 2025
Engine and Drive Train
Engine type | Engine type | In line | Engine type | In line crankpin offset |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bore | Bore | 73.4 mm | Bore | 81 mm |
Stroke | Stroke | 56 mm | Stroke | 63.93 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 124 HP | Engine power | 105 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 9,500 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 10,500 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 97.4 Nm | Torque | 67 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 7,700 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 8,500 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 11.8 | Compression Ratio | 13.5 |
Fuel system | Fuel system | Injection | Fuel system | Injection |
Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping |
Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
Transmission Type | Transmission Type | Gearshift | Transmission Type | Gearshift |
Number of gears | Number of gears | 6 | Number of gears | 6 |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 4 | Cylinders | 2 |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
Valves per cylinder | Valves per cylinder | 4 | Valves per cylinder | 4 |
Valves | Valves | DOHC | Valves | DOHC |
Cooling | Cooling | liquid | Cooling | liquid |
Displacement | Displacement | 948 ccm | Displacement | 659 ccm |
Suspension Front
Front suspension | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork |
---|---|---|---|---|
Diameter | Diameter | 41 mm | Diameter | 41 mm |
Travel | Travel | 120 mm | Travel | 120 mm |
Adjustment | Adjustment | Preload, Rebound | Adjustment | Compression, Preload, Rebound |
Suspension Rear
Suspension | Suspension | Swing arm | Suspension | Swing arm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Shock absorber | Shock absorber | Monoshock | Shock absorber | Monoshock |
Travel | Travel | 140 mm | Travel | 130 mm |
Adjustment | Adjustment | Preload, Rebound | Adjustment | Preload, Rebound |
Material | Material | Aluminium | Material | Aluminium |
Chassis
Frame | Frame | Steel | Frame | Aluminium |
---|---|---|---|---|
Frame type | Frame type | Double cradle | Frame type | Load-bearing engine |
Trail | Trail | 110 mm | Trail | 104.6 mm |
Brakes Front
Type | Type | Double disk | Type | Double disk |
---|---|---|---|---|
Diameter | Diameter | 300 mm | Diameter | 320 mm |
Piston | Piston | Four pistons | Piston | Four pistons |
Technology | Technology | Petal | Technology | radial |
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Diameter | Diameter | 250 mm | Diameter | 220 mm |
Piston | Piston | Single piston | Piston | Double piston |
Assistance Systems
Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | ABS, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Shift assistant with blipper, Cruise control, Traction control | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | ABS, Riding modes, Launch-Control, Ride by Wire, Quickshifter, Traction control, Anti-wheelie |
---|
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 120 mm | Front tyre width | 120 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 180 mm | Rear tyre width | 180 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 55 % | Rear tyre height | 55 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Length | Length | 2,065 mm | Length | 1,995 mm |
Width | Width | 830 mm | Width | 745 mm |
Height | Height | 1,075 mm | Height | 1,150 mm |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,450 mm | Wheelbase | 1,370 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 830 mm | Seat Height | 820 mm |
Kerb Weight (with ABS) | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 213 kg | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 183 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 17 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 15 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A | License compliancy | A |
Equipment
Equipment | Equipment | LED daytime running lights, LED-Headlights, TFT display | Equipment | LED-Headlights |
---|
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Kawasaki Z900 2025

The new Z900 masters the balancing act between modernisation and proven virtues remarkably well. The 6-axle IMU, the precise quickshifter and the new electronics package make it technically absolutely up-to-date, while the characterful four-cylinder engine loses none of its fascination despite Euro 5+. The harmonious setup of all components is particularly impressive: whether suspension, engine or ergonomics - the overall package is just right.
Harmonious engine with impressive acceleration in the mid-range
very well functioning quickshifter with precise responsiveness
mature riding performance with a good compromise between stability and nimble handling
sensitive 6-axle IMU with harmonious control
superbly tuned seating position
excellent engine reponsiveness
confident cornering behaviour with transparent feedback from the front
harmonious electronics that do not restrict riding pleasure
smooth transmission with perfectly tuned ratios
first-class stop-and-go behaviour in city traffic
intuitive bike for beginners and experienced riders
slim waist despite four-cylinder layout
Great 5 inch display but the possibilities are not perfectly utilised with the Rideology app
licence plate holder seems a little carelessly integrated into the design
fuel consumption in practice significantly higher than factory specification (6.0-6.5l instead of 4.8l)
suspension of the basic version a little stiff on poor asphalt
promised app functions not yet available at the time of testing
Aprilia RS 660 2025

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.