Husaberg TE 300 2012 vs. Suzuki RM-250 2009

Husaberg TE 300 2012

Husaberg TE 300 2012

Suzuki RM-250 2009

Suzuki RM-250 2009

Loading...

Overview - Husaberg TE 300 2012 vs Suzuki RM-250 2009

Husaberg TE 300 2012

Husaberg TE 300 2012

Suzuki RM-250 2009

Suzuki RM-250 2009

Technical Specifications Husaberg TE 300 2012 compared to Suzuki RM-250 2009

Husaberg TE 300 2012
Suzuki RM-250 2009

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore72 mmBore66.4 mm
StrokeStroke72 mmStroke72 mm
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement293.2 ccmDisplacement249 ccm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width80 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height100 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width110 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height90 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter19 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,475 mmWheelbase1,465 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height985 mmSeat Height950 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity11 lFuel Tank Capacity8 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husaberg TE 300 2012

Husaberg TE 300 2012

The TE 300 was and remains a favourite, even in the new generation. Whether it's a special stage, narrow forest trials or endless steep slope climbs, the TE300 is never out of place. Simply a bike with which you can't go wrong.

Very wide range of applications

simple but solid two-stroke technology.

none

Suzuki RM-250 2009

Suzuki RM-250 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH