Yamaha YZF-R6 2012 vs. Yamaha R9 2025

Yamaha YZF-R6 2012

Yamaha YZF-R6 2012

Yamaha R9 2025

Yamaha R9 2025

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha YZF-R6 2012 vs Yamaha R9 2025

Yamaha YZF-R6 2012

Yamaha YZF-R6 2012

Yamaha R9 2025

Yamaha R9 2025

Technical Specifications Yamaha YZF-R6 2012 compared to Yamaha R9 2025

Yamaha YZF-R6 2012
Yamaha R9 2025

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore67 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke42.5 mmStroke62.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power124 HPEngine power119 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power14,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque65.7 NmTorque93 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque10,500 rpmRpm at Torque7,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13 Compression Ratio11.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionTransistorIgnitionTransistor
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement599 ccmDisplacement890 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDeltaboxFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,040 mmLength2,070 mm
WidthWidth705 mmWidth705 mm
HeightHeight1,095 mmHeight1,180 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,375 mmWheelbase1,420 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height850 mmSeat Height830 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA2, A

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha YZF-R6 2012

Yamaha YZF-R6 2012

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Yamaha R9 2025

Yamaha R9 2025

Even though the R9 has not become an uncompromising R6, it has a sporty character and performs well even on the race track and is a lot of fun to ride. Beginners will probably find it even easier to get to grips with on the track than an R6. On the other hand, the R9 with its high-torque engine and more relaxed riding position is much more suitable for everyday use, even if it naturally does not achieve the riding comfort of an MT09. And Yamaha has already shown that the new bike can also perform well on the race track with its opening victory in the Supersport World Championship. With its A2 suitability and favourable entry-level price, Yamaha has created a new approach to the everyday supersport bike, which is certainly also interesting for beginners.

Large usable power range

good automatic gearshift with extended functionality

suitable for road and racetrack use

integrated data recording

Narrow knee angle for tall riders

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha YZF-R6 vs Yamaha R9

Price Yamaha YZF-R6

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha R9

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH