Yamaha MT-09 SP 35 kW 2025 vs. Honda CB650R 2024

Yamaha MT-09 SP 35 kW 2025

Honda CB650R 2024
Loading...
Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-09 SP 35 kW 2025 compared to Honda CB650R 2024
Yamaha MT-09 SP 35 kW 2025
Honda CB650R 2024
Engine and Drive Train
| Engine type | Engine type | In line | Engine type | In line |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bore | Bore | 78 mm | Bore | 67 mm |
| Stroke | Stroke | 62.1 mm | Stroke | 46 mm |
| Engine power | Engine power | 95 HP | Engine power | 95 HP |
| Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 9,000 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 12,000 rpm |
| Torque | Torque | 93 Nm | Torque | 63 Nm |
| Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 7,000 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 8,500 rpm |
| Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 11.5 | Compression Ratio | 11.6 |
| Fuel system | Fuel system | Injection | Fuel system | Injection |
| Starter | Starter | Electric | Starter | Electric |
| Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath |
| Ignition | Ignition | Transistor | Ignition | Digital, Transistor |
| Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
| Transmission Type | Transmission Type | Gearshift | Transmission Type | Gearshift |
| Number of gears | Number of gears | 6 | Number of gears | 6 |
| Cylinders | Cylinders | 3 | Cylinders | 4 |
| Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
| Valves per cylinder | Valves per cylinder | 4 | Valves per cylinder | 4 |
| Valves | Valves | DOHC | Valves | DOHC |
| Cooling | Cooling | liquid | Cooling | liquid |
| Displacement | Displacement | 890 ccm | Displacement | 649 ccm |
Suspension Front
| Front suspension | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brand | Kayaba | Brand | Showa |
| Diameter | Diameter | 41 mm | Diameter | 41 mm |
| Travel | Travel | 130 mm | Travel | 120 mm |
Suspension Rear
| Suspension | Suspension | Swing arm | Suspension | Swing arm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shock absorber | Shock absorber | Monoshock | Shock absorber | Monoshock |
| Adjustment | Adjustment | Compression, Preload, Rebound | Adjustment | Preload |
Chassis
| Frame | Frame | Aluminium | Frame | Steel |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frame type | Frame type | Twin Tube | Frame type | Twin Tube |
| Rake | Rake | 65 degree | Rake | 64.5 degree |
| Trail | Trail | 108 mm | Trail | 101 mm |
Brakes Front
| Type | Type | Double disk | Type | Double disk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter | Diameter | 298 mm | Diameter | 310 mm |
Brakes Rear
| Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter | Diameter | 245 mm | Diameter | 240 mm |
Assistance Systems
| Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | ABS, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Shift assistant with blipper, Cruise control, Traction control, Anti-wheelie | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | ABS |
|---|
Dimensions and Weights
| Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 120 mm | Front tyre width | 120 mm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
| Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch |
| Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 180 mm | Rear tyre width | 180 mm |
| Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 55 % | Rear tyre height | 55 % |
| Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
| Length | Length | 2,090 mm | Length | 2,120 mm |
| Width | Width | 820 mm | Width | 750 mm |
| Height | Height | 1,145 mm | Height | 1,150 mm |
| Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,430 mm | Wheelbase | 1,450 mm |
| Seat Height | Seat Height | 825 mm | Seat Height | 810 mm |
| Kerb Weight (with ABS) | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 194 kg | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 202.5 kg |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 14 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 15.4 l |
| License compliancy | License compliancy | A2 | License compliancy | A |
| Range | Range | 280 km | Range | 314 km |
| Combined CO2 emissions | Combined CO2 emissions | 116 g/km | Combined CO2 emissions | 112 g/km |
| Combined fuel consumption | Combined fuel consumption | 5 l/100km | Combined fuel consumption | 4.9 l/100km |
| Stationary noise | Stationary noise | 96 dB | Stationary noise | 97 dB |
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha MT-09 SP 35 kW vs Honda CB650R
Price Yamaha MT-09 SP 35 kW
Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.
Price Honda CB650R
Model year
Current average market prices
















