KTM Freeride E-XC 2016 vs. Beta Xtrainer 300 2020

KTM Freeride E-XC 2016

KTM Freeride E-XC 2016

Beta Xtrainer 300 2020

Beta Xtrainer 300 2020

Loading...

Overview - KTM Freeride E-XC 2016 vs Beta Xtrainer 300 2020

KTM Freeride E-XC 2016

KTM Freeride E-XC 2016

Beta Xtrainer 300 2020

Beta Xtrainer 300 2020

Technical Specifications KTM Freeride E-XC 2016 compared to Beta Xtrainer 300 2020

KTM Freeride E-XC 2016
Beta Xtrainer 300 2020

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typePerimeterFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeSingle disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width80 mmFront tyre width80 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height100 %Front tyre height100 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width120 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,418 mmWheelbase1,467 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height910 mmSeat Height910 mm

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM Freeride E-XC 2016

KTM Freeride E-XC 2016

Uncomplicated and well-designed enduro motorbike. Technically, the entire package appears high-quality and mature. You suddenly find yourself riding Enduro much more often again - the E-XC is simply always there. But please do not consider it a classic Enduro. It cannot replace a petrol enduro, but is rather an admittedly high-priced second device.

High torque from standstill

uncomplicated handling

whisper-quiet

high control quality - far better than electric scooters from China

perfect in narrow terrain at low speeds

high traction on steep slopes.

weak rear brake

high price

long connecting stages are not its strong point

Beta Xtrainer 300 2020

Beta Xtrainer 300 2020

All in all: a lot of Enduro for little money - the 1000PS editorial team is thrilled. The seat height on the Xtrainer is about 2 centimetres lower than on competition-oriented sister models, which creates a lot of security in the saddle and also makes it particularly interesting for smaller riders. With the slightly slimmer frame and about 1.5 centimetres less wheelbase, the Xtrainer is easy to manoeuvre through the undergrowth. Especially in slow and technical passages, it scores points with this manoeuvrability and at the same time gives a sovereign feeling in the saddle. The engine is wonderfully linear in every situation and always perfectly controllable. You never have the feeling of being underpowered with its 36 hp in the open version. With the slimmed-down chassis, there are actually only disadvantages in fast sections or on the occasional excursion to the motocross track. Here it is no longer in its territory and the usual hard enduros have a noticeable advantage. In short: You get a lot of motorbike for comparatively little money. What is on offer probably satisfies the majority of enduro riders. So if you don't care about your ego when buying and look at the facts soberly, it's hard to get past the Xtrainer.

playful handling

accessible seat geometry

perfectly controllable engine

smooth running and torque-oriented

favourable purchase price

electronically controlled oil injection

long maintenance intervals

all-round uncomplicated machine.

Suspension at the limit in fast sections

less ground clearance compared to KTM & Husqvarna Hardenduros.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM Freeride E-XC vs Beta Xtrainer 300

Price KTM Freeride E-XC

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Beta Xtrainer 300

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH