Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 vs. Yamaha MT-10 2017

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Yamaha MT-10 2017

Yamaha MT-10 2017

Loading...

Overview - Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 vs Yamaha MT-10 2017

The Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 and the Yamaha MT-10 2017 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, inline four-cylinder engines with liquid cooling and fuel injection systems. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Yamaha MT-10 2017 has a slight advantage with 160 HP compared to the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016's 149 HP. The Yamaha also has a higher torque of 111 Nm compared to the Suzuki's 106 Nm. This means that the Yamaha may offer slightly better acceleration and overall performance.

Both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension and swing arm with a monoshock for the rear suspension. This setup provides good stability and handling for both models. However, the Yamaha MT-10 2017 has an additional advantage with its Deltabox frame, which is known for its rigidity and improved handling characteristics compared to the Suzuki's twin tube aluminum frame.

In terms of braking, both bikes have double disk brakes at the front with similar diameters. However, the Yamaha MT-10 2017 has slightly larger front disks with a diameter of 320 mm compared to the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016's 310 mm. This may provide slightly better braking performance for the Yamaha.

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Both bikes come equipped with ABS as an advanced rider assistance system, which enhances safety by preventing wheel lock-up during braking. However, the Yamaha MT-10 2017 also features traction control, providing additional stability and control during acceleration.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have similar front and rear tire widths and diameters. The Yamaha MT-10 2017 has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1400 mm compared to the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016's 1460 mm. This may result in slightly different handling characteristics for the two models.

The seat height of the Yamaha MT-10 2017 is slightly higher at 825 mm compared to the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016's 815 mm. This may affect the comfort and ergonomics for different riders.

In terms of weight, both bikes have similar kerb weights with ABS, with the Yamaha MT-10 2017 weighing 210 kg and the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 weighing 209 kg. This means that there is not much difference in terms of weight between the two models.

Yamaha MT-10 2017

Yamaha MT-10 2017

Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity of 17 liters, providing a decent range for longer rides.

In terms of strengths, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 is praised for its powerful engine, good braking control, stable and sensitive chassis, comfortable seating position, and relatively low price. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-10 2017 is praised for its great sound, pleasant wind protection, comfortable seating position even on long tours, great engine response, and balanced overall package despite its radical looks and wicked sound.

In terms of weaknesses, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 is criticized for its front end appearance and its throttle response in the lower rev range, which is considered to be too aggressive. The Yamaha MT-10 2017 is criticized for its inactive seating position on the racetrack and its chassis and ride assistance systems, which are considered to be sufficient for track days but not on the same level as other Powernakeds.

Overall, both the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 and the Yamaha MT-10 2017 are capable naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. Depending on individual preferences and priorities, riders can choose between the two models based on factors such as engine power, handling, rider assistance systems, and overall riding experience.

Technical Specifications Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 compared to Yamaha MT-10 2017

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016
Yamaha MT-10 2017
Show all
Same only
Differences
Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016
Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016
Yamaha MT-10 2017
Yamaha MT-10 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke59 mmStroke50.9 mm
Engine powerEngine power149 HPEngine power160 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,500 rpm
TorqueTorque106 NmTorque111 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,500 rpmRpm at Torque9,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.2 Compression Ratio12
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement998 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter43 mmDiameter43 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel120 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel130 mmTravel120 mm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeDeltabox

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter310 mmDiameter320 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter250 mmDiameter220 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height50 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,115 mmLength2,095 mm
WidthWidth795 mmWidth800 mm
HeightHeight1,080 mmHeight1,110 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,400 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height825 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)209 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)210 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Some might be surprised that after waiting so long, Suzuki did not launch the ultimate, uncompromising power naked bike. Instead, the Suzuki GSX-S 1000 with its 149 hp seems almost too well-behaved. But once you ride it on the race track, you quickly realise that the engine is far more powerful in real life and that the rest of the performance of the chassis and braking system is also impressive. In return, it also offers a large portion of everyday and practical suitability - not bad ingredients when you have to cover everything from everyday to race track with a single bike.

Powerful engine

good braking control

stable and sensitive chassis

comfortable seating position

relatively low price.

Front end looks too good

toxic throttle response in the lower rev range

Yamaha MT-10 2017

Yamaha MT-10 2017

The Yamaha MT-10 exudes a lot of emotion with the cool CP4 engine, but also doesn't forget pragmatic utility. For a naked bike, it offers a lot of comfort on long tours. It rides fast but is still refined at all times. On the racetrack, the chassis is not precise enough to beat the other Powernakeds. Overall, however, it scores with its versatility paired with radical looks and awesome sound.

great sound

pleasant wind protection

comfortable seating position even on long tours

great engine response

balanced overall package despite radical looks and wicked sound

Too inactive seating position on the racetrack

chassis and ride assistance systems sufficient for trackdays but not on the same level as the other Powernakeds.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki GSX-S1000 vs Yamaha MT-10

There are a few key differences between a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 and a Yamaha MT-10 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-10 2017 is about 20% higher. A Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 experiences a loss of 90 GBP in one year and 1,340 GBP in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 1,010 GBP and 1,700 GBP for a Yamaha MT-10 2017. Compared to Yamaha MT-10 2017 there are less Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 10 compared to 12. It takes less time to sell a Suzuki GSX-S1000 with 109 days compared to 143 days for a Yamaha MT-10. Since model year 2015 1000PS.de editors have written 36 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 and 32 reviews for the Yamaha MT-10 since model year 2016. The first review for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 was published on 27/09/2014 and now has more than 17,100 views. This compares to more than 20,700 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-10 published on 17/11/2015.

Price Suzuki GSX-S1000

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-10

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG