Kawasaki Z900 2017 vs. Triumph Tiger 800 2011

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Triumph Tiger 800 2011

Triumph Tiger 800 2011

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z900 2017 vs Triumph Tiger 800 2011

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Triumph Tiger 800 2011

Triumph Tiger 800 2011

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z900 2017 compared to Triumph Tiger 800 2011

Kawasaki Z900 2017
Triumph Tiger 800 2011

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore74 mm
StrokeStroke56 mmStroke61.9 mm
Engine powerEngine power125.4 HPEngine power95 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,300 rpm
TorqueTorque98.6 NmTorque79 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,700 rpmRpm at Torque7,850 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement948 ccmDisplacement799 ccm

Suspension Front

AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentRebound

Suspension Rear

AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentRebound

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height80 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter19 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,070 mmLength2,215 mm
WidthWidth820 mmWidth795 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,555 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height795 mmSeat Height830 mm
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

An incredibly well-designed motorbike. A lot of test work and attention to detail went into it. It has exactly the right power, exactly the right chassis and exactly the right look. An all-round successful naked bike that will make you happy for a long time. If you like, you can ride it simply and faithfully, but if you want, you can also ride it really fast and it wheels like hell. Great!

Ingenious nakedbike chassis

superb looks

engine responds super fine, revs up willingly and has a perfectly dimensioned torque

optimum intersection of performance, price and practical use

Knee angle very narrow for tall people (order another seat!)

Triumph Tiger 800 2011

Triumph Tiger 800 2011

It seems Triumph has built a motorbike that has made the most pronounced trait in wildcats - suppleness - the overriding principle of its dynamics. The Tiger is elegant, controlled and deliberate in the use of its power.

Homogeneous power development

smooth ride

loud sound

ABS.

Gearbox somewhat stiff during lively gear changes.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z900 vs Triumph Tiger 800

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Tiger 800

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH