Honda VFR 1200 F 2010 vs. Honda CTX 1300 2014

Honda VFR 1200 F 2010

Honda CTX 1300 2014
Loading...
Technical Specifications Honda VFR 1200 F 2010 compared to Honda CTX 1300 2014
Honda VFR 1200 F 2010
Honda CTX 1300 2014
Engine and Drive Train
Bore | Bore | 81 mm | Bore | 78 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stroke | Stroke | 60 mm | Stroke | 66 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 172 HP | Engine power | 84 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 10,000 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 6,000 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 129 Nm | Torque | 106 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 8,750 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 4,500 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 12 | Compression Ratio | 10 |
Starter | Starter | Electric | Starter | Electric |
Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath |
Ignition | Ignition | Digital, Transistor | Ignition | Digital, Transistor |
Transmission | Transmission | Prop shaft | Transmission | Prop shaft |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
Valves per cylinder | Valves per cylinder | 4 | Valves per cylinder | 4 |
Cooling | Cooling | liquid | Cooling | liquid |
Displacement | Displacement | 1,237 ccm | Displacement | 1,261 ccm |
Suspension Front
Front suspension | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork |
---|
Chassis
Frame | Frame | Aluminium | Frame | Aluminium |
---|---|---|---|---|
Frame type | Frame type | Twin Tube | Frame type | Twin Tube |
Brakes Front
Type | Type | Double disk | Type | Double disk |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Six pistons | Piston | Three pistons |
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Double piston | Piston | Three pistons |
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 120 mm | Front tyre width | 130 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 190 mm | Rear tyre width | 200 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 55 % | Rear tyre height | 50 % |
Length | Length | 2,250 mm | Length | 2,380 mm |
Width | Width | 755 mm | Width | 940 mm |
Height | Height | 1,220 mm | Height | 1,170 mm |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,545 mm | Wheelbase | 1,645 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 815 mm | Seat Height | 735 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 18.5 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 19.5 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A | License compliancy | A |
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Honda VFR 1200 F 2010

Like the other Honda models in the test, the VFR is also convincing on the brakes and has no weaknesses when it comes to safety. It's just a shame that you have to refuel every 300 kilometres.
Mechanical dual-clutch transmission
incomparable acceleration feel
sporty driving style
sophisticated technology.
Extremely high consumption of urine.
Honda CTX 1300 2014

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Honda VFR 1200 F vs Honda CTX 1300
Price Honda VFR 1200 F
Model year
Current average market prices
Price Honda CTX 1300
Model year
Current average market prices